Wouldn’t women have to deal with “discomfort” from losing to males they have no chance of beating?
Do you understand that you’re implying all women are physically inferior to all men? That a man could never lose a race to a woman?
Or do you think we should always exclude all the top athletes because everyone else would also feel “discomfort from losing to [people] they have no chance of beating?"
It’s a shame I got censored, but I wasn’t implying anything.
The facts are that women can compete in men’s divisions whenever they feel like it. If there is a women who can compete with men in running, then there’s nothing stopping her from doing that.
The purpose of a women’s division is specifically to exclude people who are more performative than women so that women have a fair playing field to compete on.
Yes, women’s sports should exclude men because men are physically superior to women. That’s why we have an open division where anyone who is competitive can compete, and exclusive divisions where we need to artificially restrict access so people who can’t compete in an open division have a fair shot.
checks modlog
Transphobia, referring to trans women as “males”
Trans women literally are males, and I wasn’t specifically referring to them; I was referring to all males. What is this nonsense? Transphobia is stating objective facts now?
I guess I had to say: “Wouldn’t women have to deal with “discomfort” from losing to males and transwomen they have no chance of beating?” in order to beat the censor police.
This forum is full of children who can’t handle reality and need to plug their ears whenever they see something they don’t like. Literally no group of people cries wolf as much as transpeople trying to censor anyone who isn’t loyal.
Go ahead, censor me again. You’ll just be proving me right.
Do you understand that you’re implying all women are physically inferior to all men? That a man could never lose a race to a woman?
Or do you think we should always exclude all the top athletes because everyone else would also feel “discomfort from losing to [people] they have no chance of beating?"
It’s a shame I got censored, but I wasn’t implying anything.
The facts are that women can compete in men’s divisions whenever they feel like it. If there is a women who can compete with men in running, then there’s nothing stopping her from doing that.
The purpose of a women’s division is specifically to exclude people who are more performative than women so that women have a fair playing field to compete on.
Yes, women’s sports should exclude men because men are physically superior to women. That’s why we have an open division where anyone who is competitive can compete, and exclusive divisions where we need to artificially restrict access so people who can’t compete in an open division have a fair shot.
checks modlog
Trans women literally are males, and I wasn’t specifically referring to them; I was referring to all males. What is this nonsense? Transphobia is stating objective facts now?
I guess I had to say: “Wouldn’t women have to deal with “discomfort” from losing to males and transwomen they have no chance of beating?” in order to beat the censor police.
This forum is full of children who can’t handle reality and need to plug their ears whenever they see something they don’t like. Literally no group of people cries wolf as much as transpeople trying to censor anyone who isn’t loyal.
Go ahead, censor me again. You’ll just be proving me right.