cm0002@piefed.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 days agoWebplemmy.mlimagemessage-square213fedilinkarrow-up1618arrow-down1136 cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1482arrow-down1imageWebplemmy.mlcm0002@piefed.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square213fedilink cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-square𝕨𝕒𝕤𝕒𝕓𝕚@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up60arrow-down2·1 day agoQuality loss? Webp supports lossless.
minus-squarepalordrolap@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up20arrow-down1·1 day agoSo does JPEG. It doesn’t mean that people (will) use it for that.
minus-squareMower2560@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·23 hours agoActually? I didnt know that. Is it used often? Any downsides ?
minus-squarefilcuk@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up5·23 hours agoPractically never because it’s rubbish. The only possible use is on old precision machines that don’t support newer standards, like medical imaging.
Quality loss? Webp supports lossless.
So does JPEG. It doesn’t mean that people (will) use it for that.
Actually? I didnt know that. Is it used often? Any downsides ?
Practically never because it’s rubbish. The only possible use is on old precision machines that don’t support newer standards, like medical imaging.