quantum computing is still in its very early infancy, literally NOTHING about it is stable yet. we can barely get them to run a dijkstra’s algorithm, let alone anything actually useful. if you don’t keep the processor cool enough it’ll just kill itself, and we’re already trying to mass produce them? putting that aside, quantum computers have a very small use case. most things it does, a classical computer can do better. who is the target userbase for this? the very saturated market of theoretical quantum physicists? i am very skeptical of this man
quantum computing is still in its very early infancy, literally NOTHING about it is stable yet. we can barely get them to run a dijkstra’s algorithm, let alone anything actually useful. if you don’t keep the processor cool enough it’ll just kill itself, and we’re already trying to mass produce them? putting that aside, quantum computers have a very small use case. most things it does, a classical computer can do better. who is the target userbase for this? the very saturated market of theoretical quantum physicists? i am very skeptical of this man
Better to over-invest into quantum computers than under-invest into them.
Plus, technological development bears fruit on the timespan of decades.
field has promise but for the next few years it’s not gonna have much use, can’t wait for quantum cybersec to become a thing tho
I read something about them being able to crack encryption once they’re powerful enough? This was years ago tho
still true but setting quantum computers up is a pain in the ass
if I heard about them right, the appeal of photonic ones is they’re room temp
second point still stands, but damn they’ve made a room temp quantum computer? we might be making advances for once.