Samdell@lemmy.eco.br to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agosome rulecdn.imgchest.comimagemessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up1281arrow-down15
arrow-up1276arrow-down1imagesome rulecdn.imgchest.comSamdell@lemmy.eco.br to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square19fedilink
minus-squareastropenguin5@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·edit-22 months agoHonestly kinda interesting there are no m/m/m/m/m fivesomes or m/m/m/m foursomes
minus-squareLiome@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up29·2 months agoIt’s search result for “F”, hence no F-less results.
minus-squareyourNewFavouriteUser@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·2 months agoFoursome and Fivesome, the Fs are present
minus-squaremizule@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agothe Fs are highlighted, but not matched on. The search is prioritising singular Fs, not attached to words…
minus-squareastropenguin5@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoThe Fs are highlighted in the other ‘foursome’ and ‘fivesome’ though Could just be that because there are less fs they are lower on the list and not visible? Idk
minus-squareTinidril@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 month agoPeople into those are a bit too busy to be searching it online.
Honestly kinda interesting there are no m/m/m/m/m fivesomes or m/m/m/m foursomes
It’s search result for “F”, hence no F-less results.
Foursome and Fivesome, the Fs are present
the Fs are highlighted, but not matched on. The search is prioritising singular Fs, not attached to words…
The Fs are highlighted in the other ‘foursome’ and ‘fivesome’ though
Could just be that because there are less fs they are lower on the list and not visible? Idk
People into those are a bit too busy to be searching it online.