• Irvine Fantasy No@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    Men mad that the app exists are part of the problem.

    Non-men are still gonna talk shit and warn about ya, so die mad about it I guess.

    • Jakob Fel@retrolemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, imagine men being angry that raging feminists had an app which allowed them to dox any man they want and ruin that man’s reputation (and life).

      Them darneded men!

      • sleepundertheleaves@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        24 hours ago

        How?

        No, seriously, how is this ruining men’s lives?

        Even if everything posted on this app was believed by everyone who used the app, so any man named on this app had their reputation ruined in the eyes of anyone who used it -

        The users of this app are a tiny, tiny minority of women.

        Nobody’s being arrested based on this app. Nobody’s being sent to jail based on this app. No one’s even being publicly humiliated based on this app, because the app isn’t public - the “tea” is only accessible to users.

        The only consequence of being named on this app is that a handful of women now have a bad opinion of you.

        How does this ruin anyone’s life?

        • Saleh@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          23 hours ago

          When i was in highschool there was a popular “gossip” website. Even though i never heard about it, until the school urged parents to take their children off of it, it apparently was used for severe cyberbullying that devastated some students.

        • icelimit@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          21 hours ago

          The app isn’t exclusive, any person (women, for the most part) have the ability to join said app. Your definition of (not) ‘public’ is shaky at best. Even then, humiliating someone without their knowledge behind closed doors is not cool even in the best of circumstances.