tldr: Australian pressure group Collective Shout has claimed responsibility for the recent Itch.io and Steam developments that have seen the platforms change how they deal with - and in some cases remove - NSFW games and content from their respective platforms.

The group had already been closely linked with the situation, which has seen Itch.io and Steam scramble to appease payment providers like Visa as they suddenly took an interest in the kind of games available on the platforms, especially those which contravened rules and “standards” the payment providers apparently had. It led to Itch.io deindexing all NSFW content from its browse and search pages, and Steam introducing vague new rules about adult content, while removing a slew of games.

“In response to false claims and misinformation about our campaign, we’re setting the record straight,” wrote Collective Shout in a Facebook update. "Some have asked why we involved payment processors, and others have claimed we are responsible for Itch.io removing all NSFW content.

"We raised our objection to r*pe and incest games on Steam for months, and they ignored us for months. We approached payment processors because Steam did not respond to us.

“We called on Itch.io to remove rpe and incest games that we argued normalised violence and abuse of women. Itch.io made the decision to remove all NSFW content. Our objections were to content that involved sxualised violence and torture of women.”

Collective Shout shared a timeline of the campaign on its website, noting how it began with No Mercy, a game which involves extreme sexual violence, being brought to its in March. The group’s actions - a mixture of petitioning, emailing, and lobbying - began in early April and led to the game being removed from sale later that month.

  • Goodeye8@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    In this context it’s definitely a hot take considering the prudish neighbor was able to make freaky shit “illegal” anyway, and in far greater capacity than any single government could. Rape and incest games ain’t for me but when they get banned because a handful of people decide for the rest of us how the world is supposed to look like without anyone else getting a say in the matter I take serious offense. At least if they went the legal route the process would’ve a) been transparent and given an opportunity for others to make a case and b) not instantly affect the entire world.

    This “scary government is going to take away your rights” just leads to private enterprises taking away your rights without any oversight. This entire thing is a case in point. The government can take away your rights but at least you have a way to fight for your rights, what are you going to do against oligopolistic payment processors taking away your rights?

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Rape and incest ain’t for me but I take serious offense when they get banned

      phrasing

      • Goodeye8@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        You do realize that was not the end of the sentence?

        But just for you I added the word games and then moved the structure around.

        • otp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          Haha, it wasn’t the end of the sentence, but I don’t think the rest of the original sentence meaningfully changed that particular clause!

    • amino@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      i hate to inform you that these lobbying groups are acting exactly like a state would, actually. maybe don’t lecture to trans people and tell us how the state works, we interact with the state way more than you will ever have to 💋

      what are you going to do against oligopolistic payment processors taking away your rights?

      idk, what are YOU gonna do? are cis people gonna finally fight for trans autonomy or are they gonna act like us having autonomy is too insane?

      are you gonna finally listen to us like when trans sex workers told you a decade ago that banks, the police and payment processors are policing our money or are you gonna let the issue fester because you don’t want your family to know you stand with trannies and whores?

      • Goodeye8@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        2 days ago

        Okay, the smug “you’re not one of us so don’t speak” argument… Alright, then we’re just not going to have a discussion. Just don’t forget that if one of these groups ever use payment providers to suppress trans rights you supported this.

        • amino@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          20
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          not surprising at all that you chose to go the blue MAGA “enjoy your camps, then” route instead of taking a step back. the only smug person here was you not realizing you’re way out of your depth

          • nekbardrun@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Sorry, excuse me for making this comment, but I kinda think that the user Goodeye8 was agreeing with you since the start.

            Anyways I wish you well.

          • Goodeye8@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Do you know that you can edit your comment before you post? Because if you post and then edit the rest of comment in later others might miss that when replying? Anyway, not that you’ve actually addressed something in your previous comment I’m going to respond to that. I’m going to ignore what you’ve said right now because that shit is just too dumb to respond to.

            idk, what are YOU gonna do?

            I already complained to my government.

            are cis people gonna finally fight for trans autonomy or are they gonna act like us having autonomy is too insane?

            The fuck are you on about? I’m not against trans people. We should all have humane levels of rights.

            are you gonna finally listen to us like when trans sex workers told you a decade ago that banks, the police and payment processors are policing our money or are you gonna let the issue fester because you don’t want your family to know you stand with trannies and whores?

            Again, the fuck? I’m also pro sex work because sex workers regularly get exploited and I think legalizing and regulation sex work would make their lives safer.

            Also do you see how insane you act? I disagree with you on one thing and then you automatically assume I also disagree with you on (probably) all the other things. You’re turning me into a villain in your own mind, and for what purpose? So you could dehumanize me? You’re acting exactly like the conservatives who hate your guts.

            • amino@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              yeah, you got me. not liking liberals makes me a trump supporter. the overton window always ends at being a “progressive” slightly to the left of Ronald Reagan and anything beyond that is just the ice wall keeping us from finding out that the earth is flat