• don@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Random? I’m not seeing a 15 kg slab of raw horsemeat, no charred emu leg hanging off the side, no half digested contents of crocodile stomach, no unidentifiable roadkill from somewhere in Georgia (the country, not the state, but the state will do, too), no puréed human back meat, not even so much as a speck of walrus, ostrich, cassowary, kangaroo, or beluga; guess otters, marmot, geese, dog and cat (I don’t like it either, but they did say “random” ffs) don’t count as having meat…

    The fuck do you mean, random? That shit’s about as well ordered as the unabridged Oxford English Dictionary, ffs.

    • qupada@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Random might not be the right word, can we settle on “anonymous”?

      It sounds a bit sinister, sure, but underscores the whole don’t-ask-don’t-tell nature of the contents of charcuterie nicely.

      • don@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Given that language is prescriptive, “random” has, at least in regards to colloquial usage, rather lost its dictionary definition of “made, done, happening, or chosen without method or conscious decision”. Hell, I use it colloquially, as well. There’s nothing wrong with this usage.

        I’m just trying to provide a bit of a humorous comparison between the usages by somewhat demonstrating what the charcuterie might look like if the dictionary definition was to be used, instead.