The context clues would’ve been relevant maybe for Assad, but not for the new government of Syria, which alot of people have claimed was/is actually being rather collaborationist with Israel.
Hamas attacked Israel so Israel attacked Palestine
US funded Israel so Israel attacked Iran.
Iran attacked Israel back so US attacked Iran.
US told both sides to stop so Israel attacked Iran.
Israel attacked Syria.
That’s the context so far. What am I missing about Syria?
use context clues.
The context clues would’ve been relevant maybe for Assad, but not for the new government of Syria, which alot of people have claimed was/is actually being rather collaborationist with Israel.
Hamas attacked Israel so Israel attacked Palestine
US funded Israel so Israel attacked Iran.
Iran attacked Israel back so US attacked Iran.
US told both sides to stop so Israel attacked Iran.
Israel attacked Syria.
That’s the context so far. What am I missing about Syria?
Doesn’t that context miss the first 50 years of Israrel attacking Palestine before the Hamas attack?
this is what my response is to. the stuff about syria is not in the context of what I’m taking about.