I can only afford the time to play one of them, which one should I play?

Many YouTubers seem to prefer BotW. But most reviews say TotK improves nearly everything.

I prefer easier combat and less complexity. Is there one that would be more enjoyable for me?

  • NeryK@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    3 days ago

    Play BotW first. A few years down the line, if you ever want more and are able to make time for it, play TotK. One should not play them back to back anyway.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Agreed. I waited 2-3 years between them, and TOTK still feels a bit samey, but I do appreciate waiting because I’ve forgotten enough that there’s still a sense of discovery.

  • Owl@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    BOTW. It is truly a masterpiece

    TOTK has a lot of not-so-fun time consuming elements, worse combat and is overall more bland

    Also TOTK is very, very, very gimmicky

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      TOTK has more creative combat, such as my kid fusing a bomb barrel to a shield, which blows up enemies when they attack. Other than that, the combat feels very similar to BOTW, and there’s new enemy types (and I think more variety?).

      It’s certainly gimmicky, and I think the puzzles are easier, though neither has particularly great puzzles. I personally think TOTK is the better sandbox game, while BOTW is a little better Zelda game, but they’re both kinda crappy Zelda games IMO.

  • BurgerBaron@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Breath of the Wild blew me away emotionally. It felt like Zelda 1 made in modern times to me.

    TotK was like a remix with more stuff to do, but I’d already played BotW so a samey sequel didn’t impact me as powerfully. I still played the entire thing and loved it, this may sound more negative than it really is.

    I think if I could only play one and hadn’t played either before, I’d go TotK.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m not a fan of BOTW because it doesn’t feel like a Zelda game, but a Zelda-themed open world adventure game. TOTK is a better sandbox game, and everything except the abilities and puzzles feel strictly better (though I’ve only done 15 or so), and the puzzles kinda sucked in BOTW anyway.

      I don’t recommend either to Zelda fans, but I would recommend TOTK over BOTW for someone considering getting one. If you’ll eventually play both, play BOTW first.

  • doomcanoe@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    It’s actually refreshing to see so many people supporting TotK—that’s not always the common opinion.

    Honestly, both games have a lot to offer, and they’re both spectacular in their own right. But given your concerns about time, I’d actually recommend BotW. Both games are designed in a way that lets you “play at your own pace” and then wrap up the main quest whenever you feel like it—or not.

    But TotK takes that concept to another level. There’s so much more to explore, the mechanics offer an incredible variety of possibilities and skill expression, and if you’re planning to dive into a game for months, TotK is definitely the one to go for. The game constantly encourages you to think, “What if I tried it this way?” or “Would this crazy idea even work?” And you can easily lose yourself for hours trying out different things, which is a ton of fun!

    That said, this also means TotK can feel more “padded,” which is saying something since BotW already had its fair share of “filler content”. But frankly a lot of TotK’s content is just there to give you more opportunities to play around with the sandboxy elements.

    And while these new mechanics give you fresh ways to approach the game, their freedom also opens the game up to repetitive strategies and exploits that can become tempting to use just to “get through” a puzzle anytime you get stuck for longer than you find fun. Which can start to happen more and more the longer you play.

    Frankly, TotK is the kind of game I wish I had when I was 12 on summer break. But as an adult with limited time, it just makes me wish I had more time, much more. It’s kind of like Minecraft in that way.

    BotW has similar issues, but to a much lesser extent. It’s a more focused game with fewer opportunities to “cheese” puzzles, and it doesn’t have as much content purely designed for messing around with mechanics. Most of BotW is made up of puzzles, events, or dungeons that you can complete in one go, giving you a satisfying sense of progress in a shorter time.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m playing TOTK right now and while it’s better than BOTW (which I enjoyed), I still much prefer other Zelda games. Skyward Sword is my favorite on Switch, followed by Link’s Awakening and then Echoes of Wisdom. It’s my first time playing those first two, and I absolutely loved them.

      I’m a sucker for the classic Zelda formula: find dungeon, solve puzzles, get new ability, use ability to defeat dungeon, repeat.

      BOTW and TOTK don’t have that, the “dungeons” suck, the puzzles are even more gimmicky, and I absolutely hate crafting mechanics (cooking and elixers suck). But they’re still fun, so I play them.

      If you’ll only play one, play TOTK. If you’ll play both eventually, play BOTW. If you’re looking for a classic Zelda experience, get something else.

  • slimerancher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 days ago

    TotK definitely improves upon everything in BotW, but that doesn’t mean BotW isn’t a masterpiece on it’s own.

    doomcanoe has explained it well, I think for you, BotW is the way to go.

    Though, just to be clear, you can’t go wrong with either option. It’s like choosing between two of my favourite ice cream flavours and I can only have one. 😀

  • HorseFD@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 days ago

    Get BotW if you haven’t played either, especially if you like less complexity. TotK adds more gameplay mechanics and areas (the sky and underground). BotW is a bit more straight forward. Plus you will appreciate TotK more after you play BotW.

  • misk@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    TotK is better in every way but BotW is once in a lifetime experience due to how contemplative it can be. You’re not going to play both at the same time and they benefit from playing in order. If you’re low on cash buy some used copy of BotW off someone on Vinted* and sell on Vinted once done, then do TotK.

    * or Craiglist or OLX or whatever is used locally where you live

    • Cloudless ☼@feddit.ukOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      It is the time that I can’t afford, not the cash. It is not about playing them at the same time, it is just that it takes me months to finish just a single long game, and there are too many long games I want to play before I die.

      I still haven’t finished Skyrim which I started playing on PS3.

      • misk@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Apologies for my scatterbrain. In that case I’d go with BotW because it’s shorter/focused (others will say it’s too minimalist) and you’ll get to experience a modern Zelda game. Also, if you don’t own Switch 2 it runs good enough while TotK was just a bit too much for Switch 1.

        • Cloudless ☼@feddit.ukOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          Shorter/focused sounds good. And yes I only have a Switch Lite and I am unlikely to get a Switch 2.

          Thanks for your suggestions, very helpful.

          • neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Totk ran fine for me on the switch. I guess some parts had lag, but I can’t remember having any serious performance issues.

            • overload@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Everyone has different cutoffs for what performance is acceptable to them. I thought TOTK was fun but the low resolution and regular FPS dips made me realise I’d rather wait for the switch 2 to experience it properly.

  • Zacpod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve tried botw 4 times now. It’s the whole reason I bought a switch. It bores the living fuck out of me every time I play.

    I know a lot of people love it, and you might too. But I’ve never been able to play more than 3-4 hours in without being bored off my ass and going to play something else instead.

  • who@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I loved BotW.

    I wanted to love TotK. It brought some very welcome quality of life improvements, a darker side of Hyrule, new mechanics, and more spaces to explore. I appreciated all these things, and enjoyed it for a while, but ended up getting bored and wandering off.

    Despite all that it brings to the table, TotK feels repetitive and uninspired to me. It didn’t draw me in. It didn’t make me care about anything. Every time I pick it up again, I get bored again, and leave. I usually end up starting another BotW play-through, and having fun all the way to the end. (Edit: The DLC’s Trial of the Sword was a good challenge that I intend to repeat, too.)

    I vote +1 for Breath of the Wild.

  • evujumenuk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I finished BotW 100%, and am currently nearing 100% completion with TotK. Here’s what I would do if I were you.

    Get the BotW demo. It’s free, and it contains the entire first portion of the game, the Great Plateau.

    Play that, and when you’re finished, read the story synopsis on Wikipedia or wherever. Then acquire and play through TotK.

    The Great Plateau gives you about 80% or 90% of what’s great about BotW in a tight, controlled package. If you’ve played Metal Gear Solid V, this is basically Ground Zeroes.

    TotK is so amped up over BotW that there’s no “tutorial inside area” that showcases the mechanics of the full game, it’d basically be a carbon copy of the entire thing.

    In terms of gameplay, this should give you something pretty close to the full experience.

    Edit time! Looks like the BotW store demo was not actually generally available, let alone “free”. Since you’re only hurting for time, not money, you could still get the cartridge version of BotW and sell it after completing the Great Plateau. The rest of my reply should still apply.

  • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    Breath is barely a Zelda game. It’s fun, it’s great, but the magic formula is missing.

    Tears goes a long way towards fixing that, and is just a better game overall. But it is a very direct sequel to Breath, and I worry that it might not make as much sense plotwise as a standalone.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Neither make sense plot-wise. The opening to TOTK doesn’t even follow BOTW’s ending IMO. I haven’t finished it, so I don’t know if they tie things together later, but the reuse of the world doesn’t feel plot-relevant at all.

      Musings

      It could make sense as a prequel though, but as a sequel, it feels like a stretch. We’ll see how the game progresses.

      I do recommend playing TOTK after BOTW, but not for plot, but because it’s the same world and TOTK is simply more populated with things to do (more enemy types, more towns, etc). Both are fun games.

      If you’re looking for a Zelda game though, this just doesn’t feel like one. Yeah, you play as Link and do Link things, but the classic formula (find dungeon, get new equipment, solve puzzles, beat boss, repeat) isn’t there.

  • 🔍🦘🛎@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’d say BotW has less complexity for sure. TotK adds in a fusion system to its core gameplay, not only for vehicles but for weapons and your shield.

    I loved BotW’s story, atmosphere, combat… It just had an unmatched sense of wonder. TotK is great but didn’t recapture the magic to the same degree.