• illusionist@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Peak load of households is not during peak solar power generation. Households installing pv isn’t a solution to what you described.

    Today, you could also use a battery to buy power during mid day and use it in the evening when you need it the most.

    • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      In moderate climates in the US, peak loads are typically the hottest and sunniest hours of the day since condenser units are the most energy-hungry appliance in most homes. Clouds notwithstanding, peak solar generation would typically align (or closely align) with peak load time.

      Batteries would also help a lot - they should definitely be subsidizing the installation of those as well but unfortunately they aren’t yet (at least not in my state).

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        This is incorrect. Look up the “duck curve” or if you prefer real-world examples look at the California electricity market (CAISO) where they have an excellent “net demand curve” that illustrates the problem.

        • Naz@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          I watch big state and national grid loads (for fun) and I see two distinct peaks: 7-8AM when everyone goes to work, and then around 5-7 PM when people commute home and heat up dinner.

          Otherwise it’s a linear diagonal curve coinciding with temperatures.

          I personally try to keep my own energy usage a completely flat line so I can benefit from baseline load generator plants like nuclear (located not that far away).

          • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            I personally try to keep my own energy usage a completely flat line so I can benefit from baseline load generator plants like nuclear (located not that far away).

            If you consume energy during peak hours you are a peak load consumer. Consuming in other hours doesn’t change this fact.

          • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Your personal energy use pattern does not determine where you are drawing your power from, wtf logic is this?

        • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 day ago

          This curve has changed somewhat since this study in 2016. More efficient home insulation, remote working, and energy-efficient cooling systems have large impact in this pattern. But assuming you have a well-insulated home, setting your thermostat to maintain a consistent temperature throughout the day will shift this peak earlier and lower the peak load at sunset, when many people are returning home. More efficient heat pumps with variable pressure capabilities also helps this a lot, too.

          Given just how many variables are involved, it’s better to assume peak cooling load to be mid-day and work toward equalizing that curve, rather than reacting to transient patterns that are subject to changes in customer behavior. Solar installations are just one aspect of this mitigation strategy, along with energy storage, energy-efficient cooling systems, and more efficient insulation and solar heat gain mitigation strategies.

          If we’re discussing infrastructure improvements we might as well discuss home efficiency improvements as well.

            • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              I’m not really saying that the curve itself is changing (sorry, I was really not clear), only that those other variables reduce actual energy demand later in the day because of the efficiency gains and thermal banking that happens during the peak energy production. The overproduction during max solar hours is still a problem. Even if the utility doesn’t have a way of banking the extra supply, individual customers can do it themselves at a smaller scale, even if just by over-cooling their homes to reduce their demand after sundown.

              Overall, the problem of the duck curve isn’t as much about maxing out the grid, it’s about the utility not having instantaneous power availability when the sun suddenly goes down. For people like me who work from home and have the flexibility to keep my home cool enough to need less cooling in the evening, having solar power means I can take advantage of that free energy and bank it to reduce my demand in the evening.

              I get what you were saying now, but having solar would absolutely reduce my demand during peak hours.

            • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              Ok now go just one step further and ask yourself what variables factor into this.

              There’s a reason that pattern exists, and it isn’t because solar and cooling hours don’t align.

              • sqw@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 day ago

                the difference between demand and net demand in that graph is purely solar/wind generation, isn’t it?

                • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Essentially, yea. That, and reduced demand from people setting their thermostats to relax their cooling temps while they’re away from home. We should honestly be grateful that we’re able to produce so much more energy from solar than what we need for active cooling. It’s a good problem to have.

                  • sqw@lemmy.sdf.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    that thermostat factor reduces actual demand by a little, doesn’t impact the net difference per se.

      • illusionist@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Why do you want a subsidy for batteries? Installing batteries at a large scale at homes is incredibly expensive compared to an off site battery. Especially with regards to the move towards hydrogen.

        • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          For the same reason we want to subsidize solar production in residential construction even though it’s more efficient and cost-productive to do it at-scale. Having energy production and storage at the point of use reduces strain on power infrastructure and helps alleviate the types of load surging ayyy is talking about.

          It’s not a replacement for modernizing our power grids, too - it simply helps to make them more resilient.

          • illusionist@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            That’s understandable but do we need it now? Neither pv nor batteries last forever. I’m just not sure if we need them now (or short-medium term future). But I’m not in the position to decide upon it