• Potatar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    You cannot invoke biology to generalize here. There are many mammals who use their offsprings as projectile decoys when they are in danger.

    • Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Typically those are mammals with larger litters and shorter gestational periods. Human offspring are too resource intensive to be widely used as decoys.

      This is a weird conversation.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        That’s because you had a bad take that illogically separates the biological demands of organisms and their communities from aspects of social organization

        There is no separation, social behaviors are also adaptations to the environment.

      • Potatar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        As long as one person in history has done it once, yes. Just because people around us doesn’ do it, doesn’t mean it’s not “natural”. I don’t know how tribes with 11 disposable children behave.

        We used to be night active but if you ask anyone nowadays they’d act like waking up to the sun is THE “natural” thing.

        • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Are you suggesting that if even one human lacks this biological impulse to protect their children, we can’t say that humans generally have a biological impulse to protect their children? That’s absurd. And isn’t this point entirely moot with regards to people who do have that in-built instinct?