• squaresinger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    12 hours ago

    and a UBI replacing all welfare programs

    I’m actually against that. Not against an UBI per se, but against it replacing all welfare programs.

    The main issue here is that needs vary a lot, and depending on your specific needs, an UBI might not begin to cover them.

    One of my kids has Cystic Fibrosis, which leads to frequent hospital stays. One of the main medications (Kaftrio, that stuff is a miracle drug, it’s crazy how well it works) costs ~€350k per year.

    UBI would be a drop in the ocean in this regard.

    The same goes for a lot of other conditions. For example, a nursing home costs way more than any UBI would cover, but also if you have a disability that would require frequent assistance and/or a modified home or some special kind of transport, UBI would be just not enough.

    • darthmachina@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      But that’s where socialized healthcare comes in. None of what you brought up would have to be covered by any sort of UBI. Especially since if we had a national UBI we would probably already have socialized healthcare since the latter would be easier to get through than the former.