MalikMuaddibSoong@startrek.website to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 months agoMy favorite part of the joblemmy.mlimagemessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up19arrow-down10
arrow-up19arrow-down1imageMy favorite part of the joblemmy.mlMalikMuaddibSoong@startrek.website to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square12fedilink
minus-squareAmazingAwesomator@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agothe fact that these are strings instead of an object that is broken up by country code, area code, and number makes me irrationally angry.
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoYou absolute buffoon. How do you figure this code isn’t testing how to parse a string into such an object??
minus-squareSkull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 month ago[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]
minus-squaregandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 months agoi think you think that telephone numbers are well-structured. they are not. they are messy. they do not fit a certain schematic. I recommend also the following topic: “people have names”. https://www.kalzumeus.com/2010/06/17/falsehoods-programmers-believe-about-names/ Names do not in general fit into the schematic “first name, last name”
minus-squareCanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-22 months agoIs there not a “falsehoods programmers think about phone numbers” yet? Edit: And once again, I’m still confused about some of these. Do we need to expand unicode for names? It’s supposed to be universal. WTF is up with 40?
minus-squareSkull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 month ago[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]
the fact that these are strings instead of an object that is broken up by country code, area code, and number makes me irrationally angry.
You absolute buffoon. How do you figure this code isn’t testing how to parse a string into such an object??
[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]
i think you think that telephone numbers are well-structured. they are not. they are messy. they do not fit a certain schematic.
I recommend also the following topic: “people have names”. https://www.kalzumeus.com/2010/06/17/falsehoods-programmers-believe-about-names/
Names do not in general fit into the schematic “first name, last name”
Is there not a “falsehoods programmers think about phone numbers” yet?
Edit: And once again, I’m still confused about some of these. Do we need to expand unicode for names? It’s supposed to be universal. WTF is up with 40?
[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]