• superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    No system has ever worked at scale. Capitalism is literally destroying the planet we live on, Feudalism wasn’t any better, and no other system was ever applied at such a scale.
    Maybe the scale is the problem, and the Anarchists were right all along.

    • Commiunism@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Anarchists would still have to deal with scale in terms of trade, production and centralization - after all, not every commune would be able to produce penicillin, insulin, chips, phones, steel, etc as a hobby. In other words, they would still have to replace capitalist system to a decent enough extent to be able to meet all their needs.

    • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      (most) Anarchists don’t have a problem with scale, just with hierarchy. We can have democratic and free associations at any scale.

      • superkret@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 hours ago

        You can’t force your system onto every society and culture on earth, as Capitalism has done, when your system is Anarchism.

        • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 hours ago

          That’s true. Imperialist ideologies like capitalism or the state socialism of the CCCP have an advantage in spreading their influence globally. But there’s nothing in principle standing in the way of one world, one federation, a million tribes. Anarchism does scale quite the well in that regard