cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 7 months agoJunior Prompt Engineeringlemmy.mlimagemessage-square53fedilinkarrow-up1767arrow-down18cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1759arrow-down1imageJunior Prompt Engineeringlemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 7 months agomessage-square53fedilinkcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-squaresnooggums@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·edit-27 months agoWhat, like some kind of design requirements? Heresy!
minus-squareBjörn@swg-empire.delinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down1·7 months agoDesign requirements are too ambiguous.
minus-squaresnooggums@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·7 months agoDesign requirements are what it should do, not how it does it.
minus-squareheavydust@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up5·7 months agoThat’s why you must negotiate or clarify what is being asked. Once it has been accepted, it is not ambiguous anymore as long as you respect it.
minus-squarepsud@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 months agoI’m a systems analyst, or in agile terminology “a designer” as I’m responsible for “design artifacts” Our designs are usually unambiguous
What, like some kind of design requirements?
Heresy!
Design requirements are too ambiguous.
Design requirements are what it should do, not how it does it.
That’s why you must negotiate or clarify what is being asked. Once it has been accepted, it is not ambiguous anymore as long as you respect it.
I’m a systems analyst, or in agile terminology “a designer” as I’m responsible for “design artifacts”
Our designs are usually unambiguous