• jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    One of the major prerequisites for people to get charged with war crimes, is to lose the war.

    • Kalash@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      One of the major prerequisites

      Not the only one though as Afghanistan was indeed lost.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s more that, win or lose, the United States never had its sovereignty threatened by Afghanistan. They could potentially have continued supporting terrorists and lobbing attacks against the US, but the US government wasn’t going to collapse because of it as long as they did literally anything.

          Without that, it’s pretty unlikely to see a major US politician in front of the ICC no matter how much they deserve to be there.

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The US had total air and naval superiority in Afghanistan, so them having a nuke is irrelevant.

              The US also did not “lose” in Afghanistan, but people always turn into dipshits when that’s brought up.

                • SCB@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The vast majority of countries with nukes have a functioning navy and air force, which means they have a theoretical delivery system for those nukes.

                  The US, as an example, would absolutely go to war with Pakistan if geopolitical factors necessitate it.