• SCB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    57
    ·
    1 year ago

    There are headphones that use the USB port. Headphone jacks are kinda dead tech at this point.

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hard disagree, you might not use them, but they are critical in many settings.

      Credit card reader, comfortable headsets, hooking up to other systems, audio without batteries, etc. There are a good number of people who still use headphones! (Including most people in South Asia…)

      • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Credit card reader hooked into headphone jack is a dead tech too now that the rest of the world have moved on from mag stripe to chip and pin.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        comfortable headsets, audio without batteries

        These are both solved via USB headsets tho?

        • jet@hackertalks.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Downsides of usb-c headphones:

          1. Bluetooth security risk surface, exposes your phone to more attacks.

          2. Most/all phones have a single usb-c port. Charging and using headphones difficult

          3. Usb-c port placement is awkwardly on bottom of phone while must headphone jacks are on top of the phone. Plugging in your headphones on the bottom of the phone with a dongle is awkward.

          4. The entire process of using a usb-c dongle or using Bluetooth headphones makes the entire system more complicated. KISS (keep it simple). The more complexity there is that can go wrong, the worse the experience. If I’m taking a important conference call, I want my audio to just work.

          5. Bluetooth audio is delayed compare to wired

          6. Bluetooth Microphone standard is quite poor, the sound quality when talking on a group calls is bad compared to wired.

          Not directly related: the whole point of removing the headphone jack was to sell airpods. First apple, then android, and even fair phone. Each time the jack is removed to push sales of the branded Bluetooth ear buds. It’s a user hostile move.

          https://www.wired.co.uk/article/apple-airpods-success

          The excuse may be to save money, Space, water rating, but the reason is increased sales.

          I personally still use a pixel 5A which had a headphone jack only because it’s the B tier phone for markets where people are less likely to also buy the airpods.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            21
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you buy this phone, you’re exclusively buying it for sustainability, so you’re already accepting an inferior product.

            There’s no reason to cling to headphone jacks as if those are somehow a worthwhile technology.

            • jet@hackertalks.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I just outlined my use case, very concisely I thought. It may not be your use case. But please don’t dismiss my use case because you don’t use it yourself. Its only polite.

    • dx1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Audio quality loss and latency are built into Bluetooth. Its only advantage is not having a wire.

        • dx1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh, you mean USB headphones? TBH, way overly complex compared to analog with (albeit negligible) audio quality loss, which still works with legacy tech going back decades. It’s like arguing a bicycle is obsolete because motorcycles exist.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            If bicycles and motorcycles competed for the exact same role, with an opportunity cost allowing only one, how would bicycles not be obsolete?

                • potustheplant@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You did, because you’re assuming that you can only choose one or the other. Even though it’s been demonstrated that the headphone jack does not require much space, can even be added to phones that don’t have it (check out Strange Parts on yt) and does not have any drawbacks.

                  That opportunity cost is not a thing.

                  • SCB@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    If you can add it to a phone that doesn’t have it already, I’m not sure what the problem is, in your view.