• jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Could be a combination of first time with ranked choice and too many candidates. Somebody is going to earn a degree doing the analysis here.

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s almost certainly the number of candidates. On the other hand, top three out of a much smaller number doesn’t present voters with a lot of choice.

    • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      If it’s really just a matter of too many candidates, could they increase the number of signatures needed to get on the ballot?

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        It was less the number of signatures and more that this is the very first election for a new system of government, it drew out a TON of people.

        Previously, we had a mayor and 5 city councilmen. Each elected city wide in a typical first past the post election.

        Now we have a mayor elected citywide in a ranked choice, choose 6 election, who hires a city manager to run the different bureaus.

        Then the city is split into 4 districts, each electing 3 councilmen in a rank 6 ballot.

        So the city council is going from 5 to 12 and each district is guaranteed representation where often not only was it not guaranteed, there WAS no representation.

        All in all, between the mayor and the council seats, 119 people were running.