• CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Well, unless they cave because they are getting death threats from magaferbrainz and threats to their career from the likes of Tommy GROOMERville.

  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Not the intelligence community 😢

    Tulsi Gabbard is a shitty person and an opportunist but if she actually undermined the effectiveness of the intelligence community (which remains to be seen), it’d be a good thing. Like, oh no, what if they get mismanaged to the point where they can’t infiltrate leftist groups or coup governments? What if they don’t assassinate Assad and create a power vacuum for a group like ISIS to take over? The horror!

    People have such bizarre, incomprehensible politics. “Trump is a fascist, but it’s super important that we make sure he has a highly effective spy network.” What? It boggles my mind that even in “normal” times, people care about the effectiveness of organizations that are illegally spying on all of us and which have brought chaos and war to every corner of the globe.

    Anarcho-CIAism, not even once.

  • Ciderpunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The national security risk is why she was picked, hope that helps writers at the Atlantic.

    • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’ve listened to one of her Rogan podcasts. Hillary was absolutely right about her being a Russian puppet. T She parrots so much Russian propaganda it’s asinine.

      • HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        21 hours ago

        What I hate about the current situation is that there’s no room for “Russia is a significant power that won’t suddenly vanish, so maybe if we can avoid being at complete loggerheads with them 24/7, it might avoid decades of tension and expensive military grandstanding.”

        You must either fellate Putin or demand the entire 82 billion square kilometres of the Russian state turned to glass. No other options. It worries me that any more nuanced takes on Russia get pushed into the “Kremlin talking points” file.

        Not that she isn’t a screwball all on her own, but we could use a less militaristic take here.

        • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          or demand the entire 82 billion square kilometres of the Russian state turned to glass.

          Um, who is demanding that?

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I want the Russian empire to allow its people and its neighbors to live freely and as equals. Until that day I will oppose their government

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The Senate absolutely can stop her, if they choose to. They probably won’t.

      • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        Some of them are talking publicly about Gaetz, so they might. Or, Trump might nominate so many other Russian assets that Gabbard looks goid in comparison and sneaks through. Or, recess might be called, allowing Trump to appoint his entire slate of doom with no opposition.

        We’ll find out in February.

    • lychee🍒@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      i promise im not defending protest or non voters (i need to specify this before im picked apart by a swarm of piranhas) but does no one realize that this massive rift in our social fabric is no longer just a political issue? would defeating trump this year have ended the rise of fascism? the intensifying hatred of minorities, the puritanism, the scapegoating, the violence? kicking the can down the road to 2028 would have accomplished nothing but delaying the inevitable.

      if trumps GOP is using the rhetoric they use purely for the purposes of gaining power, had they not gained power in this election they would have just intensified their rhetoric even more and gained power in 2028 instead. these people are literally willing to destroy American society to enrich themselves and their friends.

      i voted, you voted, pretty sure everyone on lemmy (worth acknowledging anyway) voted. it was with an empty feeling in my gut though because ballots just determine presidents, they are not a panacea

  • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    12 hours ago

    No, it’s not. It’s a risk to those who have been breaking the law, including those who put her on a watchlist. I hope she’s planning to charge every one of them.

    I bet the shredders in DC are working at their limits this week.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It’s a risk to those who have been breaking the law, including those who put her on a watchlist.

      LOL, mmmkay.