• @TheSpermWhale@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    10910 months ago

    The fact they can legally charge a subscription for a fitted feature that does not pose any continuous cost for the company is insane

    • @Kra
      link
      English
      6010 months ago

      It should be forbidden by law.

      • @Cheers@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        1810 months ago

        Next we’re going to get a subscription fee to unlock the full potential of our phone batteries. But if we don’t pay, at least we’ll have 50% of the battery 🤮

        • @greenskye@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          810 months ago

          Look, just go buy a different phone if you don’t like it. Doing it this way subsidizes the price for those that don’t need the extra battery size. Plus studies have shown it’s actually good for the battery!

          /s in case that wasn’t obvious

          • @Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            -110 months ago

            Every company is doing it. Old batteries throttle so they don’t just cut out on you. I wish people would actually learn about how this stuff works before APPLE BADing, but hey. I can’t expect that much from the internet.

        • @AeroLemming@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          510 months ago

          If there was even a chance a boycott would be feasible, they wouldn’t be doing what they’re doing. The only way to force change is to force it. Voting with your wallet is bullshit and won’t work against an oligopoly.

            • @AeroLemming@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              710 months ago

              One company caving about one thing doesn’t cancel out the overall trend of enshittification and subscription bullshit. Things are getting worse on the whole because voting with our wallets just doesn’t work well enough to beat back all the corporations trying to take advantage of us.

              • SokathHisEyesOpen
                link
                fedilink
                English
                110 months ago

                I don’t disagree with you. But until we can get some sort of legislation, our only option is to not give those companies any money.

    • @tool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      610 months ago

      The fact they can legally charge a subscription for a fitted feature that does not pose any continuous cost for the company is insane

      It’s called “Rent-Seeking Behavior” and it has infected essentially every single fucking millimeter of the market.

      You’ll own nothing and you’ll fucking like it.