• @Kra
    link
    English
    6010 months ago

    It should be forbidden by law.

    • @Cheers@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      1810 months ago

      Next we’re going to get a subscription fee to unlock the full potential of our phone batteries. But if we don’t pay, at least we’ll have 50% of the battery 🤮

      • @greenskye@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        810 months ago

        Look, just go buy a different phone if you don’t like it. Doing it this way subsidizes the price for those that don’t need the extra battery size. Plus studies have shown it’s actually good for the battery!

        /s in case that wasn’t obvious

        • @Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          -110 months ago

          Every company is doing it. Old batteries throttle so they don’t just cut out on you. I wish people would actually learn about how this stuff works before APPLE BADing, but hey. I can’t expect that much from the internet.

      • @AeroLemming@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        510 months ago

        If there was even a chance a boycott would be feasible, they wouldn’t be doing what they’re doing. The only way to force change is to force it. Voting with your wallet is bullshit and won’t work against an oligopoly.

          • @AeroLemming@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            710 months ago

            One company caving about one thing doesn’t cancel out the overall trend of enshittification and subscription bullshit. Things are getting worse on the whole because voting with our wallets just doesn’t work well enough to beat back all the corporations trying to take advantage of us.

            • SokathHisEyesOpen
              link
              fedilink
              English
              110 months ago

              I don’t disagree with you. But until we can get some sort of legislation, our only option is to not give those companies any money.