Hudu the Vudu that yudu?
Hudu the Vudu that yudu?
Yeah, it’s dumb, but this isn’t the thing to call him out on. The videos posted were just of his stupid ramblings that the audience clearly took as funny. Where’s the slurred speech? Show me some clear indicators like the two-handed water drinking a while back.
I’d say it’s still important to post and talk about, not for the people who know and don’t care, but for the people who don’t know and do care.
Bro, please stop. It’s a bad look, it’s morally and ethically wrong, and it hurts our chance at never having to hear Trump’s name ever again.
You should be banned and your comment should be deleted. If you want to be a dumbfuck, please do it into the mirror like your apparent role model, Travis Bickle.
If it’s any consolation, I saw yours first, so this other guy is copying you as far as I’m concerned!
Which is as it should be, right?
This isn’t Google, it’s a social media site. It’s just people talking to other people, dude.
Makes sense, have a nice day
I thought it was a good article, why do you think it (or Rolling Stone, for that matter) is propaganda?
He’s not wrong, but that’s why it’s laughable. It’s so fucking obvious that it literally does not need to be said.
“Oh gee, why didn’t I think to ask for a favor from people close to me?”
It’s still fun, though. I think it has a cohesive look that I would call “visually distinct for gaming purposes” rather than specifically beautiful.
Schadenfreude and hyperbole. They are not literally laughing their asses off, either.
I don’t get the LLM hate. Reminiscent of the Wikipedia and general Internet hate before it, I think. It has its uses, especially in terms of general knowledge and brainstorming, but as any regular Internet user knows, you don’t just believe the first thing you read.
Here’s a fun search challenge that stumped my normal methods:
Back in the 90s Star Trek actor Michael Dorn hosted a show where he was introducing… Something. I don’t know if it was a one-off or a weekly thing, but he introduced himself by saying, “Hi, I’m Michael Dorn,” in his deep-ass voice, then he went on to talk about whatever he was introducing. The rest is a mystery to me, I just don’t remember it well enough, but for whatever reason I remember that one line clear as day. But what the hell show was it and what was he introducing?
Great point, I didn’t look closely enough, it seems.
Oooh, I like your answer better.
Looks like they backed over it, laying the pole down, then drove forward, poking the pole through the undercarriage and standing it back up.
Gah, the poor Dixie Chicks
Thank you. Now, insofar as it concerns apostrophes (he said pedantically), couldn’t it be argued that the tools we have at our immediate disposal for making ourselves understood through text are simply inadequate to express the depth of a thought? And wouldn’t it therefore be more appropriate to condemn the lack of tools rather than the person using them creatively, despite their simplicity? At what point do we cast off the blinders and leave the guardrails behind? Or shall we always bow our heads to the wicked chroniclers who have made unwitting fools of us all; and for what? Evolving our language? Our birthright?
No, I say! We have surged free of the feeble chains of the Oxfords and Websters of the world, and no guardrail can contain us! Let go your clutching minds of the anchors of tradition and spread your wings! Fly, I say! Fly and conformn’t!
…
I relinquish the pedant stick.
I wouldn’t buy them but I think they look neat. Awful Taste But Great Execution.