Doesn’t matter. The point is that not being convicted is not synonymous with innocence. Innocence and guilt both exist outside the current iteration of the justice system.
Doesn’t matter. The point is that not being convicted is not synonymous with innocence. Innocence and guilt both exist outside the current iteration of the justice system.
Deliberately putting yourself in a situation you need to defend yourself using lethal force for the sake of defending yourself using lethal force is murder.
I’m a murderer whether or not I’m convicted. Murderers predate the US justice system.
Should Rittenhouse have been convicted? Probably not, because it’s not worth sacrificing the protections inbuilt to the legal system for the sake of punishing a snivelling shit weasel like Rittenhouse. That doesn’t make him innocent though.
OJ Simpson also wasn’t convicted.
It seems kind of obvious Rittenhouse went looking for a situation he could put himself in so that he could shoot somebody. That’s murder if you can prove it, but good luck proving it.
The act of inserting this context into the system is itself context, so I’m still existing in the context of what came before
If somebody tricks you and you fall for it, it doesn’t mean what you were tricked into believing isn’t context, or that the fact you were tricked at all isnt context.
Yeah they’re going to cast like the highest paid actor in the world and then not show his face
Memories being given as an input to the system are themselves context
The UK has some real cabbage head PMs cycling through, and shot themselves in the foot by leaving the EU.
Trump served a four year term as president.
People already are starting to forget somebody just took a shot at trump. I don’t think the 18 month cycle was ever necessary.
I swear to fucking god, even he sounds confused at times.
Big Tim Curry red alert 3 energy
I imagine somebody well connected enough to be an envoy doesn’t share in the living conditions of the average citizen
I’m not saying they’ll do it, I’m saying it’s incorrect to state that there’s no valid strategic target when there absolutely is.
Ukraine?
Striking inside their territory won’t matter all that much if they can just nuke Kiyv.
And breaking the nuclear taboo is a catastrophe for everybody, regardless of who the target is.
I don’t think the comment you replied to justifies the level of scrutiny you’re putting it under.
Polling post-debate more or less justifies what it says.
I don’t answer questions from people who can’t answer my own.
You didn’t ask a question.
I have to ask: are you just ignorant of the position of the anti -Biden crowd, or are you intentionally misconstruing it as them preferring Trump over Biden?
Emperor’s New Clothes levels of straight face-edness required
Git was built specifically to avoid the necessity to have one authoritative server.
A distributed pseudonymous ledger for use by a centralised authority that will hold sensitive, personal information.
I think the paper was right.
Place your bets, people: is it willful ignorance or just denial?