We have had abysmal performance under the Liberals. Second last in the OECD next to Luxembourg since 2015, all while taking on a ton of debt, and fostering a massive housing bubble by buying half of all mortgage bonds federally and doing mass immigration. So what did we avoid?

People can believe Tesla is worth a huge premium but are skeptical of the price of bitcoin, as if the financial system isn’t all make believe.

Great news.

His wealth isn’t real, its Tesla stock. Hence why he bought twitter.

Who did Zuck stomp on?

I just remembered that parliament cant even function, and I was assuming it was them that were doing it, as a matter of enforcing accountability.

Why was parliament even prorogued for so long during all these tariff threats, was it something the conservatives did?

I think its because deflation is when the money supply is contracting and less debt is being created, so asset values begin to be valued at their actual value instead of their inflated nominal value, and people are no longer encouraged to attain the cantillon effect that drives up asset values.

Which an inflated nominal value then causes more consumption via the wealth effect, and the misallocation of capital known as the business cycle, that requires bailouts via money printing in order to debase people on fixed income which provides riskier debt issuance and more innovation.

On X86 only I think.

Now we can export our chip production to China as well, just as we did all the other high paid union jobs.

Like what, some kind of parenting?

The way I see it orchestrated by Trump is if the tariffs stay on manufacturing many provinces will be wiped out. Carney will then provide a bailout using funds from Alberta, whose exports will increase due to a devalued Canadian dollar and a 2.5x lower tariff on their higher margin product.

Which itself is a gimmick, they’ve just made the gates taller, electron leakage would happen otherwise.

Well I’ve just read Afd supporters posts about immigration. As far as being good or bad for the economy, I guess it depends if you hold assets that get inflated.

A landlord will definitely benefit, and that will definitely grow GDP; which left leaning people used to care about the poor rather than worshipping at the god of GDP. The fear of their own kind calling them a racist may have defeated that.

Destroy the poor, and maybe the fallout will fix the repercussions. Is that the plan then.

She lives in the woods and scavenges for pine beetles and bark for nourishment. She really cares, and she isn’t being groomed to be a politician who gets kickbacks for green washing.

Caroline Rogers “rang the alarm bell” on productivity, and interest rates will be higher going forward due to aging demographics, so debt will compound faster than it had been. We also had the second to last per capita GDP growth of the 38 country in the OECD since 2015, which was below inflation.

You can import a lot of people to spread the debt amongst more people, though you’ll have Trudeau’s polling numbers by the end due to severe shortages of basic necessities. Trump allowed Carney to win this last election, though if the tariffs stay in place our interest rates will also rise dramatically, and we need to spend less.

Its hard to compete with a party that offers programs using debt while also cutting taxes, because a high debt load can be kicked down the road and rolled over until it reaches a crisis.

A repeat of Trudeau Sr, which caused pain during Chretien who had to cut spending and raise taxes during a recession, which had his polls fall dramatically by the end.

Flat fees for breaking the law are only a tax on the poor. If money can buy you privilege then you live in an oligarchy.