Personally I don’t think we should’ve been supplying them in the first place for the simple fact that they’re more than suitably equipped already
I just think that if the goal is a ceasefire, neither continuing nor halting supplies would really move the needle. Want us to stop supplying them? Fine by me.
Yeah, we could cut off every possible kind of funding to Israel and they’d still have sufficient military resources to level Gaza a hundred times over
Because his legal defense wasn’t based on claiming attorney-client; it was based on the idea that he was just asking legal hypotheticals to / legal advice from legal experts
Now two of these lawyers have taken plea deals to (presumably) testify against Trump. Also, by virtue of the guilty plea in this case where Trump is a codefendant, that privilege would likely be voided anyway
he’ll give mostly equivocations, pleas to the 5th, non-remembrances, and non-answer answers that mostly cover his own ass and deflect blame from the GOP th
That’s certainly what he’s done in the media, but I’m not so sure that’s how he’ll respond when 1) he’s answering narrow questions crafted by an experienced attorney and 2) he’s answering questions after having sworn to God that he would tell the truth
Yeah a 400ft tall silo overlooking Minot AFB is concerning. It also has nothing to do with OPs article about Travis AFB
China does enough shady shit that we don’t need baseless accusations being thrown around
The 400ft tall silo was near Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota and was known to be owned by a company from China
None of that has any tie to the company that bought land near Travis AFB
Land purchased by a Chinese company near one US AFB doesn’t logically imply that any purchased land near a US AFB is a Chinese spy operation
I really like your post. I would like to add some comments, though
It seems strange to me that the framing of this is all about child labor laws–no one should have died working at any of these jobs, regardless of age–and OSHA is investigating all three incidents
You explicitly invited content that would be difficult to discern from illegal, underage nsfw content
And that was a problem–Yeah, no shit
To borrow from a comment about kbin: “Making that work requires more mods than a Bethesda game”
I genuinely appreciate that you wanted and attempted to run an instance that would be largely nonjudgmental on content, but, damn, you really shouldn’t be surprised that inviting “loli” content would be (at the very least) an enormous challenge for moderation
Are you referring to 14A arguments outside of sec. 3? I ask because section 3 has only been applied to one non-confederate
https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2021/01/11/14th-amendment-trump-insurrection-impeachment/