Every article I read speculating on the debate brought up Walz’ response to the Minnesota protests but it didn’t even come up unless I missed it? I was half expecting JD’s closing statement to try and attack Tim on it, also half expecting it to turn into a pitch to sign up for Truth and Rumble
Yeah, the implication was that if anyone actually made substantial progress in reducing prices that it would result in getting less from the sale. I thought it was the worst question and missing the point but all leaders answered it as if it was a huge concern and how there’d need to be balance
Nobody really brought it up and nobody seemed to care in any of the coverage of that debate, even on that other site, so I thought maybe it would be a talking point