Did they retaliate after Iran’s attack some months ago? I think not, but my memory is foggy
then Israel is getting levelled
By who? The Iranian remnants? Genuine question. Afaik Egypt and SA are friendly to israel, I can see them backing down in the name of de-escalation.
Also, what if instead of a nuke it’s a missile barrage?
The attack is obviously deserved but I’m scared about what happens next.
If israel strikes back, the Iran will also do so. Maybe this is the best course of action, if it leads to israel losing, but if it doesn’t, or it leads to ww3…
On the other hand, if israel does nothing, then maybe Iran will consider this a job well done and back down while the idf stays in Lebanon.
So you’re a communist that denounces every communist project atop an ivory tower, instead of understanding the realities of actually building a socialist society (no magical button that will make us overcome hierarchies overnight, I’m afraid). Sounds like you’re just larping about being a communist
Would you agree with the notion that Iran’s attack was designed to be repelled? That’s what I’ve seen on liberal media and r*ddit. They also believe that it was a showcase attack to save face.
The impact on Israel has been extremely minor, with minimal casualties and zero fatalities.
So, was the attack a failure?
It can if you don’t do a train-test split.
But even if you consider the training set only, having zero loss is definitely a bad sign.
Impressive mental gymnastics. So the “starving” Cubans live more than Americans because Americans have “too much” bread?
dreadnaughty
far left wings of parliament in America
You can’t be serious lmao
ah yes, the famous “autocracy of the proletariat”
I disagree with (1), especially for parents that cook the same 10-20 meals over and over. Even if the time it takes to cook a certain meal on your kitchen is different than the one stated at the recipe, you can note it down and get a reliable average after 5 tries.
It’s annoying that some parents can’t even do that to minimize the fights around dinner time and shift all the blame to the kids.
What’s that, a cloud gaming service?
Not really, since bits and bytes represent the same dimension of data.
Your argument is like saying “why say a car can do km/h when it is really m/s”
He is coming from a country that suffered terrorist attacks organized by the US (Operation Mongoose), being ready to fire his country’s deterrent weapons if they don’t stop receiving such attacks makes sense to me.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-cuba-trafficking-idUSKBN1WC00X
I wouldn’t trust the country that tried to assassinate Cuba’s leader, overthrow their government and organized terrorist attacks in its land to have valid criticisms for Cuba.
https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/07/23/cuba-repressive-rules-doctors-working-abroad
Health workers may also face criminal penalties if they “abandon” their jobs.
This sounds bad, but then again they’re on a foreign mission, with their country’s reputation on the line. A considerable amount of health workers abandoning their jobs might make the mission infeasible, which could create diplomatic issues for Cuba. Also, I wonder if that’s the case on soldiers (American or otherwise) on foreign missions. I would expect that they can’t abandon their jobs without penalty, and I don’t see how this is that different.
it is considered a “disciplinary offense” to have “relationships” with anyone whose “actions are not consistent with the principles and values of the Cuban society,” as well as to be “friends or establish any other links” with Cuban dissidents, people who have “hostile or contrary views to the Cuban revolution,” or who are “promoters of a way of life contrary to the principles that a Cuban collaborator abroad must represent.”
Again, these seem restrictions that would apply on soldiers on foreign missions, so it doesn’t seem weird to me that they apply to Cuba’s medical missions.
Under Resolution 168, doctors need “authorization and instructions” to “express opinions” to the media about “internal situations in the workplace” or that “put the Cuban collaboration at risk.” It is also an offense to “disseminate or propagate opinions or rumors that undermine the morals or prestige of the group or any of its members.”
I believe Cuba wouldn’t need to enforce this if they weren’t under -economic- siege by the US and their allies. What the doctors do or say on the missions could be the start of a diplomatic incident.
Others said they joined in the hope of leaving the country or of obtaining access to food, such as meat, which they cannot buy with their salaries in Cuba.
I can’t help but wonder if meat would be cheaper in Cuba without the embargo against them.
negotiated ahead of time?