Magas. The ultimate fuck you got mine (until someone get theirs instead)

Well, if a person decides to live today, it can always re-evaluate tomorrow.

If a person decides to die today, it a one way ticket. No reimbursement

Well hitting the ministry of defense is a military target, regardless of the location. Else everyone would put their military assets into cultural buildings and get shielded for free.

But yes, purely simbolico/cultural target should be off the list

I just wish it was always 12 instead of 3, 12, 1760 and whatever the eff they come up with.

Farenheit on the other hand does not make sense at all

I’m out of the loop. What is the reference?

They are basically the dark eldars of our time

Better half penis than no penis at all! /s

deleted by creator

Isn’t HOA pretty unique to America (and maybe Canada)?

Let alone die of old age. If I’m in Star wars. I would immediately dig one out and start a pharmaceutical company for anti aging products

The real question is: what profit? It’s a sink hole in a hope to maximize reach

It’s because France wants a carrier plane and Germany have no use for it. If UK (carrier) Italy (small carrier) Japan (small carrier) join, the extra money for development could allow for 2-3 variants like the f-35, that would make everyone happy

I love how much people here loves to shit on reddit, and then the userbase is 10 times worse (especially in reading comprehension, hive mind and irony)

It was the start, because even if Emperor’s went back, installed by foreign powers, they were heavily checked by other institutions, and removed again and again by the citizens of france. It ended effectively the age of absolutism and started democratic movements.

So yes, it was definitely important for democracies in Europe, a land entranced in absolutists kingdoms

Considering most monarchies are no more in Europe, it didn’t really fail miserably

Worth noting that most of the time oil (newly discovered natural resources really)makes a country poorer than richer. See Venezuela and such.

So good on Norway to not give in to unbridled corruption and out that money on a public fund to make its own citizen wealthy

If this was some one off case yes, I would agree with you. But since the sample is big enough that it affects statistical data for a very broad segment of the population, I think he might have a point. Or let’s keep the head in the sand, and then cry about why Trump is going to win every next election.

You also provided only empirical evidence (mine are fine therefore it’s everyone else fault). Not the best kind of proof.

Here is a video that highlights some of the problems. It’s two years old and still relevant: https://youtu.be/rQv8VuLpKN4

Maybe I’m reading it wrong, but it’s a one way ticket?

Thank you for proving his point

Not only that. The housing is then maintained by taxpayers, who are not the rich strata. So it’s another way to funnel money from the poor/middle class to the corporation owned by the rich.