Does it count as a tell when it’s irrelevant? Everything Trump says is a lie. You can tell he’s lying because his lips are moving. The addition of the word “Sir” doesn’t change anything.
Does it count as a tell when it’s irrelevant? Everything Trump says is a lie. You can tell he’s lying because his lips are moving. The addition of the word “Sir” doesn’t change anything.
The government can ban tobacco, but it’s undeniably tyrannical to ban a drug because you don’t like the consequences people are choosing for themselves.
Gerrymandering is legal, as is mentioned in the article. What’s not legal is racial gerrymandering. If all a court does is find a map to be gerrymandered, it won’t send it to anyone to be redrawn.
Banning specific guns is pure theater, even if it passes. There’s zero real safety in it.
You’re agreeing with the rich people in this case when you say that. They got none of those things in this case. They’re being taxed on money they could theoretically get.
deleted by creator
Lemmings in several subs, this one included, seem to reliably comment on content they haven’t actually read. It’s bizarre.
The Netherlands don’t have freedom of speech, though, so that’s immaterial. The closest thing they have is Article 7, Subarticle 3 in general, which only means they can’t legally be compelled to seek prior approval for speech.
No, they said what they were referring to: AFP saying things without confirmation.
I don’t think you’re gonna have an easy time finding people on Lemmy to defend Russia’s actions in this war.
I think you mean do know nothing.
Or… well, on the ship itself it’s spelled New New, which is a lot saner and funnier than Newnew.
It’s currently the Ameican right, not the American left, defending Israel. And only Americans think “libtard” is a word.
What, even the ones predating locomotives?
Equating Israelis with Jews is, itself, anti-Semitic.
Not an amendment.
What amendment is that? Because the 16A doesn’t say that - and neither does the core document, which is why we needed the 16A.
Do you have experience in Arizona, specifically? These allegations about weaponizing CPS to go after poor people for being poor are state-specific.
Well, the poster is mostly linguistic prescriptivism (defining what words mean). That small caveat at the bottom that words can mean whatever you want them to can’t really defeat the entire rest of the poster.
That’s not true. You don’t have to ask someone to stop committing defamation before suing them for defamation.