• 0 Posts
  • 32 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: September 25th, 2023

help-circle

  • pixelscript@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlBut this... does put a smile on my face
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I replied to that thread.

    OP was claiming to be working on a static HTML-serving search engine. They suggested that because it’s just HTML and CSS, and that interested parties can use Inspect Element to read the network requests, that it constituted “open source”.

    Commenters then got on his case about not open sourcing the server backend. OP defended that choice saying they didn’t want a competitor taking their code and building a company off of it that would “drive [them] out of business”. Uh-huh. So, proprietary software, then. Bye.




  • pixelscript@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlApple
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    7 months ago

    In a rather unorthodox way, yes.

    Android is one of those rare examples of a Linux kernel not being paired with GNU tools. I believe Android wrote their own versions of all the tools they wanted.

    The kernel is also extremely locked down by default. They very intentionally designed the OS in such a way that every facet of the kernel is kept abstracted away from you. It’s about as black-boxed as you can get, to the point where the fact that it’s Linux underneath is almost meaningless.


  • Too many experts who value the deeper teaching potential angle seem to never want to acknowledge the bounce rate it will also have.

    No, not everyone asking about how to get into the Linux ecosystem is doing so specifically because the knowledge itself is its own reward. Those who are will tighten their belts, whiten their knuckles, and figure it out just like you hoped they would. Those who aren’t will collapse under the sheer weight of all the bullshit and bail out. Frankly I’d consider the bulk of curious new users to be the latter and I default assume it for everyone who appears unless they indicate otherwise.

    Some people think this kind of filtering based on willingness to learn is a good and healthy thing. I call it elitism and gatekeeping.





  • pixelscript@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.ml*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 months ago

    If all characters are equally likely, it’s a fine password. It’s long and certainly immune to any dictionary attack.

    But if the attacker knows it’s generated with this method, then it is probably a poor one. Bottoms tend to spam only homerow keys, either in all lowecase or all uppercase. The restricted character set vastly reduces the search space.





  • pixelscript@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlGotta get it right
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I have lived in a home with a ceiling fan for nearly 30 years and I cannot confidently answer this question off the top of my head.

    Maybe that’s just tremendous skill issue on my part, but recognizing that all ceiling fans are standardized to spin only one way and knowing which way that is seems like a weird thing to ask of someone who also needs a mnemonic for which way to tighten screws.



  • pixelscript@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlGotta get it right
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Those are some really theoretical ways to observe a clock face.

    How about we just start saying, “torque in, torque out”? When the torque vector points in, the screw goes in (tightening). When it points out, the screw comes out (loosening). As long as you are standing on the side of the screw you can actually work with while working with it (and why wouldn’t you be?) this is never ambiguous.

    Of course, now we’re kicking the can down the road and relying on people wrapping their heads around the right hand rule… Hmm…



  • pixelscript@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlMy wife every two weeks:
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    I believe your “checkup” and their “routine cleaning” are the same thing.

    Lots of people (myself included) refer to it as a “cleaning” because, well, regardless of anything else, that’s what they actually do to you. I don’t know anyone who goes to a dentist just to have them look but they don’t touch. They clean you, too. That’s almost always the only physical takeaway effect of one of these visits.

    Also, a dentist cleans your teeth in a way you almost certainly can’t. Their practiced hands know exactly what needs to be scraped away, and they can make informed decisions on what tool to do it with and how aggressively to not cause enamel damage. Not to mention they can, y’know, actually see what they’re doing in there. So a “simple cleaning” isn’t quite as pedestrian as it sounds. It’s not something you can fully replicate by scraping around blindly with a metal pick in your mouth.


  • pixelscript@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlIts a rhombus folks
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’d argue this is at the root of all fringe theories and why they all seem to attract the same archetypes of people.

    We are living in an era of history where long traditional societal norms are in rapid turnover. The “old ways of doing things” are dying off, and the new ways that replaced them are often a revolving door. Very little in the world at any given time feels stable and secure.

    Institutional trust is breaking down. Interacting with the world in good faith is increasingly leaving you open to abuse by bad actors. Why trust anything, then? Trust is for rubes. You’re an intelligent, free, and independent thinker. You should question anything and everything that is simply handed down to you. Especially if it is unintuitive. To not do so is to be railroaded.

    And it’s that last part in particular that identifies the most fertile candidates for a good conspiracy theory. Like, is the Earth round? It looks flat to me. Essentially all evidence you can throw at the notion falls either into at least one of, “I witnessed it, trust me bro”, “hope you like letters in your math equations” (people who can’t intuit math won’t be impressed by any proofs), or "you can do this experiment at home, you just need / so you can watch for ". A depressing sum of people in the world will remain unconvinced by any demonstration that isn’t simple, intuitive, and of an overwhelmingly obvious magnitude. Complex answers or answers that observe tiny effects are scams.

    And just like that, we’ve abandoned rational thought and replaced it with trust-averse thought. We’ve invented the notion that the world is a hostile place where anyone trying to hand you something is an agenda-pusher trying to extract something of value from you. All of the world’s major institutions are shams designed to keep you complacent in some sort of world order that is merely using you. To participate in it is to further your enslavement.

    In that hellish headspace, conspiracy theories almost feel like a haven. Finally! A group of real thinkers who share your frustrations about the world! The underground movement working to free us all from the hostile system!

    Except, no. At best it’s just a bunch of people who are wrong indulging in a little harmless escapism. At worst it’s a mass of people getting Immanuel Goldstien’d by the very kind of well-spoken swindler they’re breaking their collective backs bending over to avoid in the first place. Regardless the form it takes, my hypothesis remains: proliferation of conspiracy theories is merely a symptom of a lack of trust.


  • I appreciate the gusto, but I find rally posts like this to be extremely irritating.

    Do you really think the people who are saying he’ll just get away with it all don’t think all of these things? Do you think people dropped their morals on the issue and now think “this is fine” because it’s the status quo?

    Pray tell – what can I do, today, as a drop in the fucking ocean, to ensure this specific white collar criminal gets summarily apprehended, convicted, and meaningfully punished for his crimes on a reasonable timescale? What reasonable, concrete action am I supposed to take that will do a damn thing about it that I’m not already doing by dutifully casting my ballots and boycotting support for people and causes I don’t believe in at every opportunity?

    I am convinced there is no such action. The dominos that matter in this specific case were already set long ago. All we can do at this point is make logical predictions about how they will fall. And from my point of view, “Donald Trump will not be meaningfully punished” is looking inevitable. I have no faith in the current stacking of the judicial system to declare an outcome I’d be content with. I and others like me are not happy about it. But we aren’t deluding ourselves either. The train for proles like us doing anything about this now is long gone.

    Now, I don’t think it’s hopeless on the grand scale. We can and should work to claw progress on the general form of this issue over time. There’s lots we can still do about that. Activism, protesting, dragging people to polls, etc. But that will likely be a “plant a tree whose shade you will never sit in” kind of thing.

    Regarding this specific man today, I think we are powerless to meaningfully affect the trajectories of these cases. Anything short of rioting in the streets, casting aside legal process, and marching on the courthouse demanding his head on a pike (in other words, stooping to the level of Jan 6th insurrectionists) is too slow and/or only theoretical. And I am very tired of cheerleaders trying to tell me otherwise when they offer no substantive plan of action.