![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/db7182d9-181a-45e1-b0aa-6768f144911a.jpeg)
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
or begin a comment in Inno
They did have a trial - that’s how it got appealed
deleted by creator
it would be “nonsensical to imagine the framers of the amendment, fearful of former Confederates returning to power, would bar them from low-level offices but not the highest one in the land” - commented the lawyer
now? Paul Merton on HIGNFY was mocking it at least as far back as 2016
deleted by creator
V1 was a much larger pulsejet (hence the buzz) with a third of the range and ten times the payload of this thing
“The jury, he argued, was essentially allowed to conjure up damning evidence in their minds that may not have existed”
Well yes, that’s exactly what the court will do if they find that you’ve been deleting evidence - they assume that whatever you deleted must have been damning to the case otherwise why would you have told employees to use “delete after 24h” communication channels?
The soldiers saw some (unarmed, shirtless) people and one of them immediately said “terrorists!”. That’s the level of analysis that’s going on when making kill decisions here.
“please decide an amount that would prevent anyone in a similar situation as the defendant from doing this again”
(defendent literally repeats the defamatory statement at the entrance to the courtroom)
Jury: “well shit. we need to exponentiate this dollar value”
“After the verdict, Giuliani said he didn’t testify because he was worried the judge would find him in contempt, and complained that he hadn’t been allowed to enter evidence that his allegations were true, despite his not having turned over any such evidence before trial”
Just wow. Guess there’s a difference between what you’re willing to tell a reporter on the street and what you’re willing to tell the judge in court?
That’s way above the “tens of millions” that some commentators were predicting based off the filings - maybe they didn’t include the punitive damages? Or did the judge cause a surprise with the number?
Another whelk, Sean?
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Probably because https://seditionhunters.org/ will also be looking at the footage for better quality images of people. They provided a lot of the initial investigation cited in charging documents so far.
deleted by creator