There is no record of this bio

  • 1 Post
  • 520 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: December 7th, 2024

help-circle




  • I would suggest trying it, especially if the bitter or astringent notes are the issue with tea and coffee for you. Cold brewing minimizes those notes specifically.

    I cold brew myself, it’s simple and doesn’t need any special tools, just any container and some way to separate the grounds. Cold brew coffee has become more popular in the past 5 years or so. I’ve started to see premade cold brew coffee in grocery stores and coffee shops, but never cold brew tea.

    For tea you can just leave a cup of water with a tea bag in the fridge overnight, and have a cold brew to try in the morning. Or a cup of water with medium coffee grounds in the bottom, gravity is a sufficient grounds separator to test the brew.





  • No, at least not beyond a certain point.

    Entertainers increase guest happiness. Happiness is part of the rating, so entertainers do cause an increase. Most increases are capped, so you can only get so many points for happiness.

    Lost guests lowers the rating directly. As I recall the lost guest penalty is uncapped. Blocking the entrance usually results in a park rating of 0 in the fullness of time, regardless of the park.

    There are strange manipulations that allow guests to be trapped without the game realizing, which avoids the penalty. But as a normal player there’s no action that overcomes the lost guest penalty.


  • Doing so will cause a decrease in your park rating, When guests are trying to leave but unable to find the exit, it lowers the rating significantly. There’s a reason every guest goal scenario has a park rating requirement as well.

    It is effective up to a point. It takes time before the guests realize they’re trapped and kill your rating. You have to time it right. The guest spawn rate calculations include the rating, so a low rating also reduces the number of guests who spawn. Trap the guests too soon and you’ll never get enough.

    Trapping guests with no entry signs or removing the route to the exit will ruin your park in time. It can be effective in some specific circumstances but not many.


  • Politicians need to learn to not comment.

    Kamala wasn’t involved in national politics at the same time as cheney. When cheney was last in office, Kamala was the district attorney of SF, an local office that only deals with the laws of California. No plausible working relationship between the two. They were not even interacting with the same laws. They worked in entirely different levels of government. There is no need for any statement.

    Regardless of politics, any statement like this will sound disingenuous. If she knows Lynne, Liz, Mary, and the entire family well enough to have them in her thoughts, she could tell them directly. Calling someone to wish them the best in a hard time is a commendable act. Making a public statement telling other people that you care about someone else is just weird.







  • I prefer women with makeup that doesn’t draw attention to itself. Makeup with strong colors and unnatural shades isn’t my preference. Now that I’ve transitioned and wear makeup myself I wear the minimum needed to cover the remaining beard shadow. I am consistant if nothing else.

    Before I transitioned the topic of makeup came up in conversation. I mentioned my preference. One of the women in the conversation normally wore naturalistic makeup, but the next day had incredibly sparkley and colorful eye shadow. Clear statement, and probably the best possible response.



  • You seem naive believing that corporations in other countries operate with restraint.

    I agree with you that both modern tech and china are bad. However, these things are not related. You seem blinded by anti chinese prejudice, which is leading you to conflate these two issues.

    If china imploded and stopped existing, modern tech would still have all the issues we discussed.

    If Canada were able to implement a perfect data security law that was fully effective in banning all of these technological bad practices we discussed, it would not change china’s position in the market.

    That has been my point this whole time. These issues are unrelated. If you disagree, please address my point directly.


  • Korea is a major world player with aspirations to dominate the world economy. That’s kind of the premise behind capitalism. Samsung isn’t content being a small company, they are a megacorporation involved in pretty much every part of Korean society, from heavy machinery, to insurance, to medicine, electronics, capital investments, construction and more. Your assertion that only china wants to dominate international markets is patently untrue. Capitalism is defined by endless greed. No corporation would turn down domination if it has the means.

    Corporations are not democratic. Korean citizens do not get to vote for the samsung president. Corporations are the ones doing these things, not democratic institutions.

    Security and privacy are issues that matter. Violating privacy and making devices less secure isn’t only a problem when china does it.