https://giannirosato.com/blog/post/image-comparison/

It is a modern successor to formats like WebP & JPEG. WebP was barely competitive with JPEG

Stopping software mainly used for piracy has equated to the inability to do what you like with what you rightfully purchase

How to steal something you can’t own? Instructions unclear /s

As an Android user, Android phones with Google Play Services are no better - in fact I’d say they’re probably worse

This post looks LLM generated

FYI, the Pixel 8’s processor is certainly less efficient than the S23’s. If it is reportedly getting better battery life, that’s likely software related.

There is an open issue for JPEG-XL support. Once Cromite adopts JXL, I’d be willing to switch over

I wouldn’t mind leaving a lot of Earth’s natural beauty alone, as much as SpaceX’s mission doesn’t resonate with me very much

Jerma made this meme

Baffling seeing the “well, [chromium based browser] has adblock in [X Y Z] form.” Use the browser that will actually prevent this from disaster from happening again, which is Firefox.

Replace “sync” with “reddit”

What about FOSS software is inherently jank? This is a stupid take that’s likely informed by some bad past experiences, of which I’ve had many with proprietary crapware.

It is easier to find crap FOSS software because it is easier to make & maintain a FOSN project when you’re less competent & you don’t have a strategy for long term success. Proprietary software relies on for-profit motives to improve, while FOSS software relies on user feedback & community incentives. This is why, while the average quality of service from FOSS programs is potentially worse, the best QoS is usually from a FOSS program. See Elk for Mastodon for a fantastic example of premium quality.

If you look into it a bit more, the resistance around WebP is mainly because it has some crippling weaknesses. I did some visual quality testing ( here, here & here ) & I (as well as many others independently) have found that for photographic images, WebP & JPEG are equals, & Google’s messaging that lossy WebP meaningfully improves upon JPEG for general visual quality per bit is misleading. That being said, WebP has some important strengths that are not often acknowledged. In addition to transparency & (really good) animation support, it also has:

• a lossless mode that often outperforms PNG
• great nonphotographic compression (though AVIF outperforms it here)
• decent compression of photographic sources at lower fidelity, where it actually starts to beat JPEG by a good amount
• Totally royalty free

WebP’s main weaknesses are:

• not better than JPEG for photographic images at useful fidelity
• Confusing messaging from Google, may have led to slow adoption
• Based on a video codec, so no progressive decode (even JPEG has this)
• limited to 8 BPC (lossy & lossless)
• superseded by JPEG-XL & AVIF, which are both pretty much better at everything

JPEG-XL in particular is very promising. It faces hostility from Google but has an incredible breadth of features & strong compression performance, as well as Apple ecosystem-wide adoption on the way with the upcoming versions of macOS, iOS, ipadOS, etc. It is also royalty free. AVIF is better than WebP at everything except lossless, too.

Feeling any which way about WebP, it is still a shame to see it transcoded to PNG. All that wasted potential …

Discord does support WebP.

JPEG has always been royalty-free. It just supported arithmetic coding, which at the time was patented. Arithmetic coded JPEGs are exceedingly rare & you’re unlikely to run into any on the Web.

First-class Linux support from Steam means they’ll get my support every time over Epic.