finitebanjo

Correction, OP, this is the Republican Party lmao.

This is what I’m talking about, if more of us just participate in the DNC and the primaries then the losers will just sort themselves out.

Because the training has diminishing returns, meaning the small improvements between (for example purposes) GPT 3 and 4 will need exponentially more power to have the same effect on GPT 5. In 2022 and 2023 OpenAI and DeepMind both predicted that reaching human accuracy could never be done, the latter concluding even with infinite power.

So in order to get as close as possible then in the future they will need to get as much power as possible. Academic papers outline it as the one true bottleneck.

The literal definition of Liberal, now and forever, yes. It often gets misused in this social circle because 1) Tankie Propoganda who oppose human rights and social progress in the west and 2) it’s often misused by political parties with the word in their name, but if you search the definition you find exactly what I said it is.

Any movement that promotes human rights is by definition a Liberal Movement.

See that would have been a good response like 4 comments up the chain instead of throwing random insults and an illogical tantrum. But with that in mind, Harris was trying to represent the entire US and not Liberals with those statements, polls places Immigration as a top concern for 61% of Americans, but with a large gap between Republicans and Democrats in the poll and with the months prior sparking discussion of potential civil war over Texas’ national guard’s interference with federal immigration processing and deployment of razorwire in rivers where crossings were common.

Makes sense, rules for everyone or rules for no one.

You want me to backup a counterclaim, with magical evidence of subject nonexistence, to a claim with no sources? Why would I do that?

The movement gained mainstream traction in June 2018 following controversy of the Trump administration family separation policy.

So basically liberals supported if not spearheaded the movement.

It’s interesting to hear about Kick again, I figured it had fizzled out after the gambling allegations.

And yet despite everything continuously getting worse they can’t figure out what to do differently.

Incorrect, the last 7 congresses had the following party divisions:

113th 2013-2015 : 53 D - 45 R - 2 I
114th 2015-2017 : 44 D - 54 R - 2 I
115th 2017-2019 : 46/47 D - 50/52 R - 2 I
116th 2019-2021 : 45/46 D - 53/52 R - 2 I
117th 2021-2023 : 46/48 D - 51/50 R - 2/3 I
118th 2023-2025 : 47/48 D - 49 R - 3/4 I
119th 2025-2027 : 45 D - 53/52 R - 2 I - 1 Vacancy

We literally have not had more than 48 D since 2015. The most independents we’ve ever had since the 1940s was also coincidentally in just before Republicans swept the 2024 election. Every DNC “majority” we’ve had in the last decade was only with caucusing independents and also VP tiebreaker.

We ALSO never had a DNC supermajority, which is why we had to water down the Public Option healthcare in 2011-2012 due to Independent Joe Lieberman holding out and Republican filibuster, the most we’ve had since 1979 was only 58.

What does Liberals complaining about how unconstitutional the actions of the ICE are have to do with my request for citations of the claim that Liberals were fighting to keep them around?

I feel like that would work in reference to a Liberal Party like you find in parts of Europe and Australia, but the word Liberal alone just doesn’t work here.

DNC haven’t had more than 50 senators in over a decade but he still managed to pass lots of good shit like the IRA and some protections for gay marriage.

Citation?

Idk, it kind of changed how planes are made forever, with reinforced cockpit doors and all.

In their defence, I bet pilots would think about that event pretty often.

When the Police side squarely with the ICE I will consider it, as was the case with the recent protests in DC and also in downtown Denver CO, but otherwise no.

Um, akshually, there would still be lots of burning things for heat and livestock. Livestock are the majority of all mammals on earth, outnumbering humans by a lot, only 6% of mammals are wild animals. In addition, lack of preserved food would lead to higher consumption.

BUT it being so unsustainable and full of disease would mean it would rapidly decrease populations, which would decrease ecological impact after a couple of generations, so it’s a sound strategy longterm.