Yeah, but a lot of people come to the agreement that they’ll get married without an official proposal date getting set.
Yeah, but a lot of people come to the agreement that they’ll get married without an official proposal date getting set.
Oof. Sad to learn. I know to some extent people are a product of their time, but this seems like a trite worse than “he was born almost 100 years ago!”
That’s what I’d assume based on the name. If it’s radiation/fallout proof, I’d expect them to list it that way.
Ultra-right wing groups slowly taking over various branches of the government because roughly 30% of the population will always vote for them, no matter what.
I would just keep working. UBI should be unlocking the ability for us to pursue our passions, hobbies, and mental/physical health. If I just gotta work anyways, I choose my current job.
Eh, you tend to learn how to make anything you do sound like huge success, regardless of whether it actually is or isn’t.
Yup. Literally just pinch the bottom nub and it’s open.
Unfortunately most people correlate pedophile and child abuser. It makes it hard for a pedophile who has done nothing to feel comfortable seeking help.
Yes, kinda. It’s a go-to for white nationalist types to complain about a lack of diversity in opinions when they really mean they’re mad everyone hates bigotry. They feel that all conversation is biased simply because the people don’t seem to want to be haters as much as they are. So it’s not really that they want more diversity, it’s that they want the conversations to be diverse enough to accept their views.
The only reason there’s no clear answer is because it’s several answers all together.
I usually clarify that it’s been a very long time and I want it all gone.
Are you wearing shoes without socks?
Even if daycare was cheap, the rest of everything still kinda sucks.
Suicide.
The asklemmy ones are the annoying ones. It’s less a question and more a conversation starter
I’ve also assumed the same. There’s no way it’s a rare enough edge case not to be impactful
I would wager it comes from a history of being a trade powerhouse. I’m no expert, though.
Kinda. A lot of them had this very strong opinion that they were basically an economic powerhouse and were actually better off without the trades that were lopsided against them. They’re learning how trade power actually works.
Carbon neutral means you try to “offset” your carbon. It’s half scam, half helpful. The idea is if your company produces an unavoidable amount of carbon, you offset this by supporting Carbon-free solutions elsewhere making your net production “neutral”. It’s a scam because sometimes the offset is stuff that was never going to produce carbon, and also because using other areas to claim “neutral” causes a weird double count. Carbon neutral is less good of a solution than carbon free, but it’s a step in the right direction.
However, target year of 2050?? Fucking what? That’s not something to brag about, that’s painfully and embarrassingly slow. That’s embarrassingly slow to be carbon free, much less carbon neutral.
Figures. He is, however, the better choice so hopefully this helps.