The same you could say with “conversative” term meaning. In the original meaning it was “not willing changes” not “far right radical” whatever it means ( right now it’s considered to have conservative people in that group by left wing people )
The same you could say with “conversative” term meaning. In the original meaning it was “not willing changes” not “far right radical” whatever it means ( right now it’s considered to have conservative people in that group by left wing people )
Lol, strawmanning because running of your shitty arguments? Yes, indeed eot
Growing grass maybe. Normal grain has much higher requirements. It’s clear you have no idea about agriculture. Cows can eat plants which human would die after. They’re evolutionary specialized in this. Humans are not cows, maybe it’s hard to accept :-|
Can’t you understand the feed for the animals is the grain which doesn’t meet human consumption criteria? Certain amount of grain comes with the defects and is a by product of the normal grain growing process. Also the quality of the soil doesn’t allow to grow grain for human consumption because of its bad quality. Do you know that there are various levels of soil quality? The feed for animals is grown on the worst soils
Still you even touched any single argument I proved in your response. That’s the dead end of this conversation. Going vegan reducing fertilizers usage? The simple logic will tell you that it will increase the demand on plants ( going vegan, we cannot eat the feed of animals because thats very poor quality of plants, even harmful to people). So we’ll need more fertilizers on top what we already use. That’s a simple economics. We can’t feed the current 8 billion population without using the industrial way of agriculture and farming. Even with going vegan. Every economist will tell you this. That’s pure fantasy world
Very bio organic crops.
Pesticides and fertilizers without which modern agriculture cannot work (we wouldn’t be able to feed the current population) poisons whole ecosystems, people (around 200 000 people yearly https://swiss-food.ch/en/articles/jährlich-über-200000-tote-wegen-pestizid-vergiftungen )
Is it more “human”. I met people who suffer diseases exactly because of this - no compensation at all, it’s very hard to prove by the level required in court rooms
I won’t even start mentioning how many small mammals, rodents and birds and bees get killed because of modern agriculture.
Do you still feel yourself morally superior?
None, most babies needs to be fed manually
How is it connected with vegan diet for cats or let’s be laxed - feces in cows feed. I wish to know
Americans still belive that USA is everywhere. Greetings from Europe and luckily lots of your food is banned. And besides I’m wondering how american farmers feed cows with the feces. Cows after all are not that stupid and they would rather graze the grass
Your logic is impeccable. There are always some unscrupulous farmers but you say they are all of them. That indeed ends this conversation
We’re not talking about cows - don’t change topic please. I never heard of such thing even though I used to live countryside and have farmers in family
There were many papers on the feral cats stomach content. Small mammals, small rodents and even small birds sometimes. Not much of floral content. On the other side, they did research on wolves diet and actually they found traces of wild plants like blueberries. Of course it was just an apperitive to get celuloza content to easy removal of excrement. Cats’ poops are usually much drier than the dog ones, so even that suggests their culinary preferences
P.S. I added link for wolves https://twin-cities.umn.edu/news-events/talking-wolves-diets-u-m
I propose to conduct following experiment: we close a cat with juicy beef steak and juicy lettuce. We remove the owner and all people from that room: we only watch that cat with cameras. Guess what will be eaten :-)?
Embrace, extend, extinguish. Irc ( slack ), jabber ( google talk, facebook messages, hip chat), Usenet and Google groups. Just to name few. Threads should be banned everywhere in fediverse
Yes, while desktop is mostly working well, other clients are far from being usable. I totally agree with this and choices of matrix foundation are not making it any better imo. Their inventing “new features” and not polishing current ecosystem, is not a best strategic choice
Yes it does support but best on desktop. On android only pretty much “legacy” and not anymore worked on element which has performance issues
Which client do you use? Desktop is the best working, second android element slow and laggy but fullest implementation so far, worst are element x which they created only to test still draft phase feature speeding up syncing but otherwise half backed. There is no other third party clients which would be significantly complaint with the protocol
Millions flies cannot be mistaken. Democratic mob cannot be mistaken. Mobs have never lynched anybody. How ignorant you are in your ego with your “whining” argument
Coal is a basic substance, so it is in the space. Maybe there is not likely oil or gas ( although I believe methan should be pretty much available everywhere as it’s simple substance ), uranium will be in space for sure. Maybe even mining dead stars or close to dead would be possible in the future, who knows
Admitting by the ad company is for sure not a proof. So what is? If in courts, pleading is good enough for thr court