Upscaling and Framegen is a crutch unfortunately that enables studios to focus on “photorealism” that pushes sales instead of proper optimization and gameplay that many games care about. And I blame suits of course that make decisions not my fellow engineers who follow the company line.
I don’t like that this is the state of game graphics either but I would much rather it be an open technology than a proprietary, vendor-lock, black box tech like nvidia tends to do.
I will be starting MCC Halo 3 soon, BUT I’m getting impression I will have to put a stop at some point.
Private platforms have every right to ban you, even if they just don’t like you or your political beliefs. Censorship is mostly happening by the government and systematic media.
And that is why federated platforms are so important. If most people don’t wanna see someone’s bullshit they can ban him. And he has the right to run his own instance.
Note that I’m not defending Tate here. Many of his words and actions are actually harmful or hateful and he deserves to be arrested.
But there’s a line between “illegal/harmful” and “unlikeable” which we need to remember.
Spamming, scams, and many forms of white collar crime are a result of people either getting desperate for a decent living or being greedy and wanting infinitely more than others have.
If you take out these two possibilities guess what gets almost entirely extinct.
That’s basically saying that “big tech” (as we know it today) and competition-friendly capitalism just cannot coexist. Which I’m inclined to agree with.
this is a photo not a link…
the entire UK government disliked this comment
What I’m saying is that a more reasonable stance is to say “package as-is or fork it if you want I will put 0 effort to accomodate”.
Others have clarified that they are not as extreme as I thought though so maybe that’s fine.
I just think that from a perspective this seems like a “people in X country keep writing gay fanfic about my book and asking if A and B characters are gay. so I’m gonna stop selling there and also destroy All copies left in their language. Because I’m a petty man-child”.
But, once again, I hope this is not what’s actually happening here and my reading was off.
While users can be demanding, this reads like a very immature response. Going out of your way to block support and prohibit packaging, which you can let others do with 0 seconds of your time, is kinda rude.
Author may have been harassed for all I know, but this is still an emotional response. They could have just said “yeah I’m not supporting this at all, figure it out yourselves if you want to” rather than actively blocking Linux functionality/packaging, which is what this sounds like.
More options is always better. I may be wrong, but I would much rather use an SDK as-intended and fine tune my integration with an external dependency (FSR or otherwise) rather than to connect my software to a DLL, which I understand is more like a static, pre-built blob.