No, it was in fact because Lula and PT are doing the same economic plan of bolsonaro in slow motion and with negligible tax rate increase to the bourgeoisie, so they allowed him to take power with US help as they are allied to the US. The bourgeoisie factions who helped the coup stayed without major support and it failed. They are the “lite” right-wing preventing the left from doing anything.
They have been flying already. But i doubt very hardly the interceptions were anywhere near the ratio these people claim
Inflation in Russia is only high if considering what neoclassicals/monetarists/neoliberals think about inflation. But this school of economics is not always dominant outside the western world and was imposed as part of its washington consensus economics, the cold war dictatorships such as Chile and Brazil, by the IMF, and by intellectual/theoretical colonialism and right-wing/libertarian NGOs. As an example, marxist economists (in terms of what is traditionally seen as macroeconomics, planned economy) and especially developmentalist economists are dominant in Brazil in universities (although the landowner/financial oligarchy and the army restricts them from getting in power as Brazil is a US colony in disguise), and in fact developmentalism is common in latin america. MMT has seen a growth in other countries.
I doubt there are F16s there.
Rojava is the puppy baby of the schizo “post-left” and their fith-collunism around the world
deleted by creator
Because they don’t want to mobilize as Russia is neoliberal. Russia has an independent central bank. If putin was so dictator and powerful like the West says, be would have already done that. The only people benefiting from this war are private Russian military companies. Russia should mobilize and wipe out the Ukrainian army, close the borders with the US and Japan with amassed troops, and prepare for a world war.
Will their central bank be statized or “independent” (rentier-instrumentalized)?
1- Clearly a right-wing liberal sociologist, common in anglophone countries but treated with scorn in sociological talent pools; Latin-America and western europe
2- Now the idea is that there will be no economic crash but “overheating”? According to who? Monetary neoliberal economic “orthodox mainstream” anglophone universities?
3- Who the fuck analyzed the military stock numbers? American military generals?
4- Why the hell is he shifting the peace rhetoric to gain time to Russia? Intellectual dishonesty at its best
Brazil industry was destroyed in the 90s by Fernando Henrique Cardoso and his wholesale destruction of our antitrust, patent and industrial laws and companies, on orders of Clinton.
Bolsonaro destroyed the rest. I’m so happy that Venezuela stopped their own Bolsonaro (Maria) and their own FHC (the second place candidate). It’s clear the US had the same plans.
They want NATO to join the war. They only don’t understand NATO helping Israel on fighting hezbollah would severely damage American image around the world, far more than Iraq. Only showing force can’t help the US with Russia in full military rise and a China who is expanding its trustworthiness around the world as never before.
How? Drone? If not, how did they went so deep without being seen? If this was by air force, Iran is fucked.
Fuck. As a brazilian this hurts my eyes. Why are all weak “marxists” in the west so weak? Trots here are far more capable than this stupid guy. Even by the logic of those who consider Russia imperialist instead of expansionist (a view i do not personally adhere to) and to all of the anti-russian fearmongering racist discourse, lenin never said imperialists can do anti-imperialist actions against imperialists. That would be self-contradictory. Only anti-imperialists are anti-imperialist.
China can definitely beat the US too. I just don`t think the “nuclear weapons would not be used” people are right. That would likely lead to our extinction.
Political science was financed along with neoliberal economists by the anglo-american bourgueoisie to undermine left political philosophers, this is why most of the humanities and social sciences in romance speaking countries and latin american countries do not take them seriously or even are derisive to them. I will not even go into the fact intellectuals from latin america who never steppet into a university (as latin america has historically never produced knowledge only inside academia) also see political scientists as a joke.
su-57 is the winner!