Sandwich is also near the village of ham
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ham_Sandwich_road_sign,_Kent.jpg
Sandwich is also near the village of ham
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ham_Sandwich_road_sign,_Kent.jpg
Add milk until the colour of He-man
What business practices in particular?
Then carefully remove the sprouts and eat the rest.
FLASH
Aaah aaaaa
Get in your car and go buy yourself a fire truck.
Your /S wasn’t loud enough. Next time try /S
Yes. It’s possible, but they are not of interest to nuclear power states.
There are nuclear plants in operation today that do not use or create any fuel that is capable of being weaponized.
And they cost too much. Governments only fund weaponizeable fission.
In fact, coal plants admit much more radiation than a modern nuclear power plant.
Not in a way that can be concentrated and weaponized.
Isn’t the main worry the “side product” of weapons grade nuclear materials?
Firing swords with a bow. Have I seen this in a parody film?
One inaccuracy in a historical report allows detractors to call the whole thing a lie.
Still not sure why you are so adamant about giving $5 a month to a monopoly generating 30bn per year. But you be you.
The difference is 45% of $12 and your original goal at the top of this thread was to support your content creators, not YouTube.
“The YouTubers” not your YouTuber.
Better just to split $7 a month between your favourite patreon accounts and put up with some advertising.
That’s an ok justification, but I thought you were buying YouTube premium to support your content creator, not to support YouTube. YouTube premium doesn’t support your content creator.
What I mean is that paying for YouTube premium is a very indirect and inefficient way to support your preferred content creator.
On the other hand, YouTube is also supporting some content creators you hate…
… But at least you don’t have to watch them.
Ohio always starts me singing the snow white dwarf song
Can we also declare war on collective nouns? I hate them all with a blaze of passion.