Not just the children - under age also includes teenagers and young adults in this case. Honestly, indoctrination has always been the case, since there is a push that drugs are harmful for all, why not indoctrinate the youngest of all: children. By the time they grow up to be teens they will be addicts.
To be fair, under aged also doesnt mean child.
Honestly, you’re right, but the issue is deeper than that. Ads like this indoctrinate people that aren’t even children - this includes teenagers past 13 and even adults of varying stages.
Advertising harmful drugs shouldnt be done at all - but in the meantime, teenagers and even young adults should be except. Also the killing part is a totally different issue.
At this point we should have an alternative to the monopolized discord we have today. Of course we have matrix but it just isnt all that popular nor easy to use as compared to discord.
The 0.0% on the poster must legally be without alcohol whatsoever. What you have in mind is a confusingly named non-alcoholic beer which goes under the official alcoholic beer radar.
actual kids
Thats the thing about it, we’re concentrating on the sake of children not teenagers - this is the easiest mass to essentially manipulate and indoctrinate. Even if the whole thing applies to teenagers aswell, the children have it the worst in this case due to biological factors and that some parents are in on it.
In an ideal world drugs shouldnt be advertised to Anyone: children, teenagers and adults alike.
Agreed, but also including teenagers.
To be fair, teenagers should also not think about alcoholic beverages.
Teenagers and some adults as well.
To be fair, quite a lot of these snow white memes move the goalposts in regards to the word “fairness”.
Narcissists feeding on other narcissists. Reddit was full of those people, and Lemmy also has them.
Any article site that says “pay to reject” is a site that should be taken with a grain of salt.
It would be 7 in the original, also fairest could mean a lot of things.
Ah the post mortem ad hominem…
Moderation would be a nightmare, especially since Lemmy is used within many jurisdictions.
I guess that is correct, the OP didn’t say it wasnt harmful - error on my part. But either way, the point to reinforce is that harm is harm.
Yep, the real point where the development stops is not widely known yet. There are even articles which say 37 might be the point, but its definite that its past 32.
Looks like we both need to learn something…
Um, there is no such thing as “less harmful”, alcohol is harmful no matter the age.
Also, if I remember correctly 32 is the lower (potential) limit to where the brain stops. Just pointing it out…
Doesnt do much when half the population doesnt know how to put one on due to failed sex ed.