Coping? What’s that?

Because any “official act” by the president is now legal, presidents are now kings, and the only treasonous thing is to not support anything and everything the president says or does

You could always put it in a (glass) container, or wrap it in aluminum foil

Her birthday is in late October. She’ll barely be 35 by the point of the election in November, but she will still be 35. So, she’d be 35 both when elected, and when inaugurated. It’s a non-issue.

But regardless: she’ll be 35 by the point of the election anyway so it’s a non-issue to begin with.

She was born October 13th, 1989. That means she’ll be 35 by the time of the election in November, not to mention before the inauguration in January (the date that actually matters). So, she’s definitely eligible.

Of note, it also straight up doesn’t work on Tom Bombadil. He is immune to its temptation, and it doesn’t make him invisible.

DEUTSCH

Not to mention: that’s punishing people who are specifically, deliberately TRYING to become parents. They’re probably among the LEAST likely to get abortions.

There isn’t any logic. The cruelty is the point.

Not all trains. I’ve yet to see a subway with one

Just gotta say: as someone who grew up going to a Unitarian Universalist fellowship, “cool” is just such an understatement. I stopped going as a teen, but they’re an incredibly warm, open, and accepting bunch. I hope you’ll end up near a UU fellowship sometime. They’re such a great (albeit quirky at times) group of people.

For anyone who doesn’t know about UUs: It’s kinda a weird decentralized meta-religion whose whole thing is basically just accepting that we all have different experiences in life. Their idea of “religious education”/Sunday school is more or less “here’s what a handful of major world religions believe, now go find what works for you and make sure to respect what works for others too”. You’ll find monotheists, polytheists, and atheists under one roof. I know it sounds like that would work, but it works surprisingly well. It isn’t about what you believe, so much as how you go about it.

Actually, it’s spelled curb in the US

But, like, to where would they be deported? That typically implies sending them back to their place of origin, but in this case they’re almost always from the US. Perhaps exile would be a better term to use.

My proposal: exile them to Texas (let’s call it a “Texile”), and then let Texas have that independence they seem to so strongly desire.

Linus Tech Tips, Linus Media Group

There are mistakes in the message, so no

Counterargument: it ruined https://youtu.be/Vx5prDjKAcw and that’s not cool.

Downvoted from lemmy.sdf.org