![](https://lemmy.stuart.fun/pictrs/image/910b6b99-09cf-4901-ba16-a9b3fff89e56.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/a8207a32-daa2-4b31-aab4-2d684fc94d18.png)
Yeah I’m not going to let the English language be shaped or solidified by people who have dedicated their lives to studying and deeply understanding language!
Just chilling
Yeah I’m not going to let the English language be shaped or solidified by people who have dedicated their lives to studying and deeply understanding language!
That’s it, I’m reporting you.
/s just in case
I wish this wasn’t so true.
It’s cool, it’s probably just self extracting. For convenience!
United States be like: 👨🦯
This is true but it’s much easier to understand in retrospect unless you have a very very gifted math teacher (or series of teachers really) when you start learning it. For most people learning algebra it’s just another checkbox to tick for some reason. Plus pesky word problems that make you figure out the equations on top of that.
Now that I’m an adult I recognize what all of this was trying to teach me. But back in my school days it was just another thing I had to do between hanging out with friends.
LMAO we really have Lemmy cliques?
Sandpaper remote, coming right up!
Maybe they’re on Azure.
Law and order is a euphemism for free minority labor. Build the laws to keep jails full since those lameo historical killjoys made outright slavery illegal.
You don’t get them for free here. You have to purchase the Big Mac meal to get the complimentary gun.
Is there a language that anyone would say really does fare well for continued development or is it just that few people enjoy maintaining code? I’ve maintained some pretty old Go programs I wrote and didn’t mind it at all. I’ve inherited some brand new ones and wanted to rage quit immediately. I’ve also hated my own code too, so it’s not just whether or not I wrote it.
I have found maintainability is vastly more about the abstractions and architecture (modules and cohesive design etc) chosen than it is about the language.
Nonsense! We will write that history so that we’re clearly the good guys!
Unless you’re saying it’s possible we’ve not always been the good guys but surely that’s not it.
You’re probably one of today’s lucky 10,000.
Or then you type the next letter of the word and the result you want goes away, but only after you’re milliseconds from tapping it.
In this economy I’m going to settle for a used threeskin in the next year or two.
Is it really that surprising though?
Maybe it’s simply because he’s not the sitting president and his detail is much smaller? I’m not at all familiar with the way FPOTUS security is run but I do believe I remember they don’t get anywhere near the resources POTUS gets. They’re also not often running for reelection so this seems like an increased risk, reduced resources situation.