I agree that the steam machine was too early.
I don’t know how it could ever start from zero without having to go through a growing stage. I think it was just necessary to have modest expectations, and so far as I can tell, valve partnered with third party vendors and didn’t lose $$$ on it.
Moreover, the downstream effect has been to set the foundation for the Steam Deck, which has been a smashing success. It just takes time to build up a mature ecosystem.
Fast forward to today, I ended up killing him and am writing this from jail.
Okay, important question here: are you writing this on Android or iPhone?
It’s really interesting how the right has embraced moral relativism on a case-by-case basis. Often it is a strategy to quarantine/localize ideas, so as to avoid the need to reconcile them to any broader worldview.
It’s also a strategy for insulating ideas and events from history that they want to shelter from criticism, like criticizing slavery, theocracy, monarchism, etc. I’ve seen real cases in the wild where criticism of slavery was dismissed as “presentism”, as inappropriately imposing present day moral values.
Between Dale and Amelia, the Earnhart family has been through a lot.
Not quite. That was the second of my two sentences. What was the first?
I learn from the best!
That wasn’t my question.
You’ve been wrong literally every step of the way about everything you’ve said and you still want to do this?
The data referenced in the report was recorded from 2021. Your link requires a login so I can’t see what it says, but if I was as much of a wreckless 💩 poster as you, I would just say securitytrails is fake and just making everything up and say “nobody cares”.
Okay, the next step in the playbook is “no one cares”. I don’t know, I think online disinformation has emerged as one of the major international issues characteristic of our time and will go down in the history books. So I’m not sure where you’re getting the idea that no one cares.
I’m sorry that calling you out on your 💩 means I’m a debate bro. But the flip side of the same coin is that you’re the one spewing the 💩💩💩.
Removed by mod
You started out by saying was no evidence, except there was. Now you’ve moved the goalposts and are debating the nuances of the evidence instead of saying that none was presented.
You derailed with whataboutism, you made a blanket generalization based on an unrelated story. Are you just going down the playbook, one derailment tactic at a time?
Five posts from now you will be saying “well yeah, maybe they proved the IP was from Russia, but the guy from Russia generated a fake site with 17 fake authors because he cared so much about journalistic integrity!”
So in your opinion is DC Weekly (mentioned in the article) in fact a legitimate american news source? I want to understand more about what specifically they are projecting.
Removed by mod
Go ahead and make your own thread about those if you like. I don’t understand why you would bring them in to try and change the subject in this particular post unless you’re purposely whatabouting.
Please even just read so much as one paragraph of the article and post anything related to that, anything at all. I don’t feel like that’s asking too much.
Yes and no. That story was bad for a reasons specific to that story that were uncovered and sourced from other credible reporting. You can’t proceed from that to a blanket generalization over everything else in New York times reports without any additional supporting evidence.
Also it’s sourcing and quoting other sources, so you’d have to explain if you believe that the New York times made up those sources.
Pretty sure the Scrub Daddy came first! It gained huge notoriety for being on Shark Tank, as one of if not the most successful Shark tank product in history, and it’s now in every Walmart and Dollar store in the country.
So the meme treats the derivative like it’s the original, which I suppose is true to form as an indicator of how people lose track of ideas as they get constantly recirculated.
Yeah and I meant what I said that you don’t get what divisive actually means.
Did people forget what divisive means? I would say it’s exactly the opposite of divisive, it’s a comment that is produced as much singular unified reaction as you could possibly get.
Don’t worry, it’s 76 and counting.
This is who I want telling me reading is bad