aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]

I don’t know what this is

  • 0 Posts
  • 447 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 26th, 2020

help-circle







  • They’re lying because they’ve been figured out. Iron Dome is not designed and can’t be used to intercept ballistic missiles. David’s Sling has all the same flaws as the Patriot air defence system it’s based on when intercepting ballistic targets, Arrow-3, the system that aims to intercept ballistic missiles in space, can be bypassed by Iran’s Fattah-1 missiles due to their ability to manoeuvre in space. This just leaves Arrow-2 as a viable intercept system, as it aims to intercept ballistic missiles in their terminal phase of flight, as the warhead re-enters the Earth’s atmosphere and homes in on the target. This works with missiles that are single stage and slow down considerably on re-entry, but for missiles with a rocket stage on the warhead that impact the target at hypersonic speeds, the intercept window is tiny time wise, so it can be overwhelmed.


  • It depends on what missiles were used. The Kheibar Shekan and Emad missiles have movable aerodynamic fins on the warhead/re-entry vehicle(RV) itself, allowing for high accuracy. Fattah-1 has both movable aerodynamic fins and a vectoring rocket on the RV, allowing for high accuracy and a hypersonic impact speed on the target. The Ghadr-110 missile only has a actuating/vectoring rocket on its RV, so it’s less accurate as it doesn’t have aerodynamic fins/wingtips.

    For accuracy, for Ghadr-110 you’re looking at a >100m Circular Error Probability(CEP), or median error radius. So the radius of the circle, when centred at the target, that 50% of warheads will land in. For Emad missiles, that’s around a 50m CEP. For Kheibar Shekan and Fattah-1, CEP is likely <20m.