• 0 Posts
  • 26 Comments
Joined 7 days ago
cake
Cake day: February 5th, 2025

help-circle



  • The DNC could have run an iguana wearing an offensive trucker hat, and we still should have voted for the iguana when Trump was the alternative or stood a chance of winning again.

    You don’t have to convince me of this. I completely agree. I’ve said only that the DNC has a responsibility to provide something better than an Iguana and for the past three election cycles, that’s what we’ve got and people are pissed. But every time you try to have meaningful discourse about how the DNC is only supplying Iguana people treat you like you’re some kind of turncoat who voted for Trump. And that’s just bullshit.

    We need to be mad at non-voters, people who “lashed out” and voted for Trump, and people who let themselves be swept away by the lies of a grifter who we did nothing but warn them about. But we also need to be mad at the DNC… It’s not entirely the voters fault and fuck anyone who says it is.



  • Anyone who didn’t vote (or didn’t vote for the only candidate likely to defeat Trump) is responsible for his win.

    Two things can be true at once. Voters not voting is bad, and it’s their fault. The DNC being incapable of finding pundits people want to vote for is also bad, and is also their fault. Pointing one out, has nothing to do with the other and both of these factors led to the election of Donald Trump not once, but TWICE.

    Pointing out the DNC’s responsibility to find electable candidates doesn’t elevate the voters responsibility. But if the DNC were capable of finding pundits voters wanted to vote for no issue would exist. You wouldn’t have people refusing to vote, or voting for Trump out of some fucked up sense of “haha, I’m gonna stick it to you!”

    Pretending like this issue is solely at the fault of the voters is so fucking disingenuous, disgusting and partyist its insane.












  • The constitution doesn’t say only the Supreme Court can decide something is illegal.

    Article III, Section 1:

    • “The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.”

    Yet another armchair expert that’s literally never taken the time to read the Constitution, which again, establishes the US Supreme Court as the highest court in the land vesting in it, supreme judicial power. So why don’t you do yourself a favor and Google what “judicial power” means…

    Congress has the power to make anything into law that they want, regardless of the legality of it. It comes down to the SCOTUS to interpret whether or not the law is indeed legal and enforceable. That is a power vested singularly in the SCOTUS by the US Constitution.



  • which lowers prices until the market adjusts.

    It depends on the market. If producing less food with the same resources costs more, prices will rise–especially on large commercial farms, which dominate the U.S. agricultural sector.

    For example, a farm designed to grow 10,000 acres of beans can’t simply reduce production to 5,000 acres due to lower demand and expect prices to drop. The unused 5,000 acres still incur costs, and farmers won’t absorb that loss–they’ll pass it on as higher prices.

    Additionally, some grocery chains buy produce through futures contracts. If these chains sell their futures for a profit, they secure produce at a bargain, cutting into farming profits. This discourages farmers from offering futures in subsequent seasons, forcing grocers to buy bulk products at higher prices instead of securing cheaper futures.