would still get restricted because they’re contentious. Like if you start talking about how you believe in equal rights, that’s something most people agree with (at least in principle,) and it shouldn’t be political. But it’s going to ruffle some feathers anyways (especially if you get any more specific than that,) so it’d be restricted.
If this is the best example you can come up with, it is fairly unconvincing that any mainstream political will be restricted.
Only white people are capable of independent thought.
Nonwhites are naturally drawn towards strongman leaders. It’s a tragedy if that strongman is also nonwhite and therefore evil. It’s a redemption if the strongman is white and therefore rational.
Nothing fundamentally changed from the 1800s.
No more landlords? That sounds like communism.
Youtube will quickly shut it down.
2018 is coincidentally the year that the average liberal realized that Taiwan and Thailand are in fact, two separate countries.
The West has been doing that for the past year and a half already. It’s not like putting undertrained Ukranian pilots in F-22s against Russian SAMs will affect the outcome of the war drastically.
Consuming a tremendous amount of energy and water in running AI models to paraphrase a book when you can read the book in same amount of time or less is capitalist innovation