SubstantialNothingness [none/use name]

  • 0 Posts
  • 25 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: November 20th, 2023

help-circle


  • This survey does an awful job of separating out the motivations.

    Financial freedom (43%) was equal to financial inability (43%), and a smaller group (31%) “attribute this to the social and political world their children would inherit.”

    I would argue that increasing financial pressures are social and political realities, rather than something separate.

    And there’s no mention of an option for “not wanting to bring children into this hell world based on aspects other than social or political realities” - like climate change or ecological destruction.

    Regardless, it does look like there are multiple factors at play here, including a concern for the future that goes beyond personal finance.










  • Dems are already fascist imo. They are fascist-lite, sure, but they never offered anything different. They have no radical difference from the GOP, just a watered down version of the same.

    I think it was inevitable that they would end up trying to out-radicalize their competition, so long as no other ideology took hold in the party. And the desperation to win just one more election at all costs, every election, meant that no such ideology could realistically take hold, unfortunately.

    The ick factor can be prevented so long as there is an in-group and an out-group, and projection paints the out-group as champions of all things bad. This prevents any significant internal reflection or criticism. It also justifies chasing the more radical fascists because - in their perspective - recruiting those fascists to the party means they can no longer be fascist, because that’s the other party’s thing. As if a party is not inherently made of people. And once(/if) the majority of fascists join the Dems, that projection will continue despite the new reality.






  • As far as I’m aware, Dems are allergic to foreign policy and just continue with whatever the Reps have set in motion.

    Which of course means that US voters don’t even have an alternative to vote for. I fully expect Harris to be more of exactly the same, and that protests and criticisms of her or Biden or whoever will continue to hold absolutely zero influence over policy.

    This is what happens when business interests become “national security.”

    I agree the empire will increasingly lash out (and also lash inward), especially with climate change factored in.

    It appears to me that China is playing the long game - but I’m not convinced this is the best strategy given the circumstances of climate change and an ailing superpower. Still, they maintain what is in my opinion the most rational foreign policy of all major powers. And they have a lot of room to pivot their strategy, much more so than the US which is entirely beholden to its corporate interests.