Starlet [she/her, it/its]

lol I was wondering about how they must feel now. But I’m sure they believe that the attack was a failure

What’s with the red line under “Warfighting”? Did their software not recognize it as a word?

“Dogboy” wasn’t meant as an insult surely

Hexbear devs are planning to fix this

it’s an emote on hexbear.net

NATO would have kept sending Ukraine bombs to use for years, and Russia would be powerless to end the war, short of abandoning the Donbass. Even though they could hold the territory, they would never win.

Only if Russia forces Ukraine to surrender - or ideally, they just surrender now - can they actually secure peace and sovereignty for Luhansk and Donetsk.

My sibling in Christ you want Russia to have let their army get shelled by NATO missiles in the Donbass without ever fighting back. Do you see why people here are calling you pro-west?

Is there anything Russia could have done that you would have approved of, other than let Ukraine kill their troops forever while they stand still? Your take is less coherent than that of libs who just think the Donbass should be part of Ukraine – at least they can say “Russia should have done nothing!”.

And just let their troops die getting shelled for the next who-knows-how-many years, without ever trying to push back and end the war? Clearly a counterattack is called for, at that point

Do you really think Russia could’ve just invaded the Donbass? Obviously Ukraine would call it an invasion and try to retake it, at which point Russia would advance into Ukrainian territory to repel them. We’d be in the exact same situation, except Russia & the Donbass would be in a worse situation.

Why the hell would Russia bother with any of that?

you guys are clearly warmongerers that want as many dead Ukrainians as possible

This doesn’t even make any sense. People normally criticize us for wanting Ukraine to surrender to end the war – are you just making this up, or??