Haha brainfart. Thought about lan domains…

Who should do this vetting though? The internet was built up with the idea of technical neutrality - everything else came on top. TLDs came later and were used to either describe the origin of a page or its intended(!) use. That leads to the case that not only can a propaganda outlet mark itself as “info” - it’s actually historically correct to do so as it’s about what the host wants to communicate.

ICANN, the organisation behind the TLDs, actually always struggles with this btw. A more recent example was the decision which domain should be reserved for local name services. It took y long time (I think years overall) to get to: .internal (edited, brainfart)

At home, in private lodgings and dedicated smoking areas.

This is one thing once more which would be a non issue if it weren’t for the people who throw their stubs everywhere and blow smoke in the faces of others.

You don’t! You observe the result. When no interaction happens the resulting pattern is described well with wave functions. If interaction happens to determine which slit it is traveling through the double line result is seen and can be described by mechanical functions.

This “we have math for both results” for interpreted to “has properties of both wave and particle”. Which I guess was one press release away from n"it’s both and depends on if I’m looking!"

The brackets were implied by OP.

I.e. “one way: (be ignorant || approve)”.

Have you not read either the abstract (“calorie deficit not helping”) or my comment? (“input on the inefficiency of diets is useless to OP without any impulse on what to do instead”)?

I don’t understand of what you’re aiming for with your oneliners.

The systematic change you describe would make sure that people are “on time” though, just redefining on what that meaning.

Being “on time” I understand as one of two things:

• Being in a place you agreed to be at a time you agreed to.
• Something happens for a lot of people and it was announced beforehand that this will do.

The first one is your responsibility, the latter is impossible to make in a way that works for everyone.

I don’t understand how this “change” should look like, what you’d expect people to do for meeting each other and events.

Of course I’m fine with “I take public transport I’ll be there between four and six” as a statement for punctuality. Beyond that though?

Whelp that’s not helpful on its own though to be honest. “long term lifestyle change” is the key word I am aware which is… Well at least I didn’t manage it so far. “just do X” is like telling an alcoholic to “just stop drinking, oh but you need a sip every other hour”.

And France has a shitload of jobs!

I bet that even your ass is still on your backside so three of three wrong.

Nah, too focused and not enough repetition and generalizations ;)

Main reason for answering: thanks!

At least by me a drink before although I appreciate the direct approach ;)

On a serious note, thank you! Looks a bit too text heavy for me (I prefer symbols) but still looks like an awesome project!

That link is a Minecraft launcher, not sure that’s the correct project? Or am I missing something? :)

It’s not about “stupid” for me but about the amount of loadedness in a question. There are indeed no stupid questions - but there are stupid assumptions.

Even one answer from. OP in it’s often easy to see if they want to generate knowledge of search confrontation.

You’re spot on!

Your choice of words made me think though:

Isn’t the dead body the one ingesting the forrest and the native maggots and flies just clean up?

You’re not being dramatic enough - if you switch your point of view from user to creator. I’ll try to explain my point of view:

This is a hardware company just learning oppen software at best and there are a lot worse scenarios.

The homepage is an artificial loop. Correct me if I’m wrong but LAN mode wasn’t even fully functional on rollout.

They create awesome and exciting machines but that you point a critique of their closed system business practice as “overly dramatic” is interesting.

From my point of view notions like this will increase the split of the communities even further (makers VS users VS builders).

This doesn’t have to be a bad thing from my perspective nor is it the fault of Bambu - it’s just that individual people with their own focus will have a vastly different perception of how much intensity (aka drama) is appropriate.