That really doesn’t mean much.

Their GitHub has everything you’d want to know.

Just burn your worn clothes and buy new ones; the true fashion industry experience.

🏴‍☠️🦜 THE ONEPIECE IS REAL!!

I still don’t like wearing my glasses. Sometimes I just use the pinhole method just so I don’t have to wear them. I’m not super blind, just near sighted. I can get about my day without them most of the time. I just find them way to distracting.

I’ll start the ad hominems now : yes it is, plus your mom kiss dudes.

!memes@lemmy.ml sort by new & start scrolling. You’ll see the same “joke” repeated 3x times in just the last 2days by the same exact user. Keep scrolling and you’ll see even more, they’re making it a daily thing.

Israel doesn't have the right to exist 
Israel doesn't have the right to exist
Israel doesn't have the right to exist
Israel doesn't have the right to exist

He manically writes over and over in a sketchbook like a schizo.

Neither is spamming cringe in a meme community.

It’s the blatant call to violence & the “haha war funny” for me.

The Smallest Thing

The British when they see literally any cultural artifact.

An alarming amount of bodybuilder do steroids…
Including the Vegan ones…
The bodybuilder industry literally survives on steroids.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3905478/#:~:text=The probability of lifetime use,anabolic steroids in their lifetime.

And it’s not just anabolic steroids like shown in the ncbi study from iran, it’s also androgenic steroids, growth hormones, testosterone boosters, and several different types of stimulants.

Here, I’ll make it more clear to you by defining what is not too far first.
In 2023 a bunch of nude cyclists were present during the public Seattle Pride Parade, while they were fully naked, half covered, etc. Their behavior is very clearly artistic expression and not inappropriate, as they were wearing body paint and commiting to other artistic representations of nudity no different from a body paint artist that are also very public in Seattle, nor were they engaging in inappropriate behavior or attempting to induce sexual arousal. In the same vein, wearing a rubber suit can also very much fall into the same category.
Does that make it more clear?
The specific cases are those intentionally engaging in behavior that can’t be defined as artistic expression and can deeply harm the overall movement, such as the rare cases of inappropriate touching/unwanted touching.
Imo, strict codes of conduct such as those used by Nudist organizations during their public events in other more lax countries should be used, not only to discourage the behavior but to also protect the integrity of the events and movements when such cases do occur. The mentioned Seattle Pride Parade for example had no official code of conduct, luckily no such case occured during this particular event.

The fire was started by individuals from a LGBTQ+ pride/racial injustice protest. I attended this march myself as well, it was primarily a racial injustice protest but a lot of individuals were wearing & celebrating pride stuff as well. The end result was many deciding to continue the protest at rec park, where then it was burned to the ground by unknown individuals. My question is entirely centered around individuals that go to far during these types of events, be it indecent exposure/genital nudity, or what law enforcement consider crimes in general, that’s what I’ve been trying to get across but certain people are seemingly misinterpreting my question on purpose and dodging the question so they can insert their own bullshit argument that has nothing to do with the question at hand & putting words in my mouth I never said. The fire example is mearly mechanism to try to drive home this primary point rather than conducive to the specific topic. The entire point of the question is to draw out your personal logical reasoning and nuance of how you perceive these specific individuals, to induce a level of reflection, to allow deepening of understanding of your stance and further push the discussion into a level of interpersonal discourse. As It’s a complex issue that requires careful consideration on a deeper case-by-case analysis & is important to discuss how such cases effect the causes pushing for social change and how theses causes can deal with them respective of the law and the rights of others, while still finding ways to make their voices heard and push for progress.

Nudity at Pride is rare, can happen, but it’s not exclusive to Pride. And also something that I think attitudes should change on. Nudity is not something that people should fear, nor should they be shamed if they are happy being nude.

Thank you for actually answering the question instead of strawman-ing like a certain someone else. I can agree to a degree. Is there a degree of nudity that you’d draw the line at? Are there cases of, say artistic expression that you’d say would get an exemption to that line?

P.s. I’m not the one who down voted your reply, I appreciate your reply as you are the only one who actually put thought into answering the question.

Having their genitalia out is too far. Butts and tits are not genitalia. What else is going too far is burning down a fucking Park.

Let me also ask you what you think about nude bike rides, where dozens, if not hundreds, of people cycle nude through a city. Is that too much for you?

Nope, that can easily be exempt as a form of artistic expression and doesn’t fit into the type of actions I’m referring to. If you’ve seen the images it’s very clearly artistic expression no different from the body paint artists that are also in Seattle.

Again I’m not fucking saying it’s a common issue. Now you’re just misunderstanding what I’m saying in bad faith.
Again I’m merely asking how you feel about these specific individuals who go to far, and in this instance beyond the bounds of “kink” during public marches.
But you keep fucking dodging the question with your irrelevant ass bullshit strawman argument, instead of actually answering my fucking question.

My point is that you seem to be worried about an imaginary issue that

I’m not worried about shit, I’m asking for your personal opinion on these very specific cases to push the discourse into careful consideration of how such cases effect the causes pushing for social change.

Just because it makes you uncomfortable or you don’t consider it LGBTQ doesn’t mean it needs to be changed.

Not even close to what I said, again this is not about people celebrating kinks or have their tits and ass out, I do not give a shit about such things.

I wouldn’t classify the behavior of these specific individuals as “kink”… , I wouldn’t even classify them as necessarily apart of LGBTQ+ either. I’m not saying it’s common either, I’m mearly ask how you feel about them. I’m referring to the specific cases of individuals who take the opportunity to put on displays of public nudity & indecent exposure outside the bonds of the law. And I’m not referring to Will Walters; butt cheeks is not nudity.

And how do you feel about the marches or rather individuals in these marches that go to far? To be clear I’m not talking about the people who wear rubber suits.

They still very much do sell it though, even if it’s “anonymized” as per their privacy policy. My sister has one of those fuckin watches, and for a week every single month, anyone connected to her WiFi gets bombarded with “feminine product” ads. This didn’t happen until after she bought the stupid watch.
While Apple claims to protect user privacy and not share personal data with third parties for their own marketing purposes, their policies also state that non-personal, de-identified information may be used for any purpose.
Infact, the FTC has issued strong warnings about it and seem very pissed off about such practice. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has warned that anonymization is no shield for ad data collection, and that companies making such claims can be held accountable for deceptive practices. Unfortunately for us, that just means that Apple would likely face fines and penalties if found to be in violation of privacy regulations, meaning Apple doesn’t give a shit as they and other massive corpos often do.
Ultimately, users are warned to be cautious about the privacy claims made by tech companies like Apple, even those known for prioritizing privacy. I personally wouldn’t even trust xiaomi, at least not without going over their privacy policies first and this goes for any companies selling such devices.